-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 257
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: handle directive conditions on fragments when building query graphs #2875
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 5077c5c The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
✅ Deploy Preview for apollo-federation-docs canceled.
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. |
… query graphs This PR addresses issues with handling fragments when they specify directive conditions: * when exploding the types we were not propagating directive conditions * when processing fragment that specifies super type of an existing type and also specifies directive condition, we were incorrectly preserving the unnecessary type condition. This type condition was problematic as it could be referecing types from supergraph that were not available in the local schema. Instead, we now drop the redundant type condition and only preserve the directives (if specified). Related: * fixes #2862 * supersedes #2864
b086574
to
0f7283d
Compare
test('fragment with interseting parent type and directive condition', () => { | ||
const subgraphA = { | ||
typeDefs: gql` | ||
directive @test on FRAGMENT_SPREAD |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe a dumb question, but how do we restrict the types that the directive can be assigned to in the query? I assume the answer is "you can't"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAIK you can only specify the locations so you cannot restrict it by types. Guessing you would need some external linter/validation logic to enforce it by type.
Co-authored-by: Chris Lenfest <[email protected]>
This PR was opened by the [Changesets release](https://github.com/changesets/action) GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated. # Releases ## @apollo/[email protected] ### Patch Changes - Updated dependencies \[[`7b5b836d15247c997712a47847f603aa5887312e`](7b5b836), [`74ca7dd617927a20d79b824851f7651ef3c40a4e`](74ca7dd), [`3f7392b84f8b626b248b59ce81f193d0f0272045`](3f7392b)]: - @apollo/[email protected] - @apollo/[email protected] ## @apollo/[email protected] ### Patch Changes - Updated dependencies \[[`7b5b836d15247c997712a47847f603aa5887312e`](7b5b836), [`74ca7dd617927a20d79b824851f7651ef3c40a4e`](74ca7dd), [`ffe67dfbdb77d15dde2ab6dee66dba05c7b5c037`](ffe67df)]: - @apollo/[email protected] - @apollo/[email protected] - @apollo/[email protected] ## @apollo/[email protected] ### Patch Changes - Avoid `>=` comparison for `FeatureVersion` objects ([#2883](#2883)) - Fix query planning bug where `__typename` on interface object types in named fragments can cause query plan execution to fail. ([#2886](#2886)) ([#2886](#2886)) ## @apollo/[email protected] ### Patch Changes - fix: handle directive conditions on fragments when building query graphs ([#2875](#2875)) This fix addresses issues with handling fragments when they specify directive conditions: - when exploding the types we were not propagating directive conditions - when processing fragment that specifies super type of an existing type and also specifies directive condition, we were incorrectly preserving the unnecessary type condition. This type condition was problematic as it could be referencing types from supergraph that were not available in the local schema. Instead, we now drop the redundant type condition and only preserve the directives (if specified). - Updated dependencies \[[`7b5b836d15247c997712a47847f603aa5887312e`](7b5b836), [`74ca7dd617927a20d79b824851f7651ef3c40a4e`](74ca7dd)]: - @apollo/[email protected] ## @apollo/[email protected] ### Patch Changes - Add a limit to the number of options for a selection. In some cases, we will generate a lot of possible paths to access a field. There is a process to remove redundant paths, but when the list is too large, that process gets very expensive. To prevent that, we introduce an optional limit that will reject the query if too many paths are generated ([#2880](#2880)) - Updated dependencies \[[`7b5b836d15247c997712a47847f603aa5887312e`](7b5b836), [`74ca7dd617927a20d79b824851f7651ef3c40a4e`](74ca7dd), [`3f7392b84f8b626b248b59ce81f193d0f0272045`](3f7392b)]: - @apollo/[email protected] - @apollo/[email protected] ## @apollo/[email protected] ### Patch Changes - Updated dependencies \[[`7b5b836d15247c997712a47847f603aa5887312e`](7b5b836), [`74ca7dd617927a20d79b824851f7651ef3c40a4e`](74ca7dd)]: - @apollo/[email protected] ## [email protected] Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR addresses issues with handling fragments when they specify directive conditions:
Related: