-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ZOOKEEPER-4221: Improve the error message when message goes above jute.maxbufer size #1614
Conversation
e861338
to
436633d
Compare
HI, The CI failed with a timeout.
I reran the following successfully:
Is there a way to rerun the CI? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, great, thank you!
we can re-trigger the CI job on jenkins / travis / wherever (I'm not really sure). But this was a quite trivial change and also AFAICS only the java 11 unit tests timeouted, so I wouldn't care much...
@ztzg , @maoling PTAL - I remember an other PR where we discussed some logging improvement with one of you around the jute.maxbuffer. (but it is also very possible that I remember wrong... anyway, can you take a look?)
using the link on the failed GitHub CI job (the one with label "Details"), you can select "Rerun Jobs". But that would re-run all GitHub based CI jobs for this PR, and that potentially can cause more flaky tests. So I think this is good enough. (we are working right now in the community to stabilize the CI for the master branch, as it is less reliable than it used to be) |
anyway, I just re-triggered the job. (actually there is only a single GitHub check that is running the java unit tests) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
@symat wrote:
I remember an other PR where we discussed some logging improvement with one of you around the jute.maxbuffer.
I suppose it was #1580, which predates this submission, but whose message is a bit less informative.
(we are working right now in the community to stabilize the CI for the master branch, as it is less reliable than it used to be)
Indeed. And FWIW, I had noted the failing test (Zab1_0Test.testNormalFollowerRunWithDiff
, failing at Zab1_0Test.java:790
); once more, the failure can be ascribed to a timing assumption. I've been collecting a few of those, and am planning to submit patches at some point.
thanks @ztzg for the review! :) |
I'm merging it now. |
@ztzg I merged this to master and branch-3.7. I think this can go to 3.7.0. Do I need to cherry-pick this to some 3.7.0 release branch, or you will cut a new release branch from branch-3.7 later? |
…e.maxbufer size Author: Mathieu Marie <[email protected]> Reviewers: Damien Diederen <[email protected]>, Mate Szalay-Beko <[email protected]> Closes #1614 from mariemat/ZOOKEEPER-4221 (cherry picked from commit 94d0c4d) Signed-off-by: Mate Szalay-Beko <[email protected]>
Hi @symat, thank you.
Same as #1611 (comment): don't worry about it, as I have to reconcile both branches anyway. I have added this ticket to my list of things to check. |
…e.maxbufer size Author: Mathieu Marie <[email protected]> Reviewers: Damien Diederen <[email protected]>, Mate Szalay-Beko <[email protected]> Closes #1614 from mariemat/ZOOKEEPER-4221 (cherry picked from commit 94d0c4d) Signed-off-by: Mate Szalay-Beko <[email protected]>
Now also in |
…e.maxbufer size Author: Mathieu Marie <[email protected]> Reviewers: Damien Diederen <[email protected]>, Mate Szalay-Beko <[email protected]> Closes apache#1614 from mariemat/ZOOKEEPER-4221
…e.maxbufer size Author: Mathieu Marie <[email protected]> Reviewers: Damien Diederen <[email protected]>, Mate Szalay-Beko <[email protected]> Closes apache#1614 from mariemat/ZOOKEEPER-4221
…e.maxbufer size Author: Mathieu Marie <[email protected]> Reviewers: Damien Diederen <[email protected]>, Mate Szalay-Beko <[email protected]> Closes apache#1614 from mariemat/ZOOKEEPER-4221
…e.maxbufer size Author: Mathieu Marie <[email protected]> Reviewers: Damien Diederen <[email protected]>, Mate Szalay-Beko <[email protected]> Closes apache#1614 from mariemat/ZOOKEEPER-4221
…e.maxbufer size Author: Mathieu Marie <[email protected]> Reviewers: Damien Diederen <[email protected]>, Mate Szalay-Beko <[email protected]> Closes apache#1614 from mariemat/ZOOKEEPER-4221
…e.maxbufer size Author: Mathieu Marie <[email protected]> Reviewers: Damien Diederen <[email protected]>, Mate Szalay-Beko <[email protected]> Closes apache#1614 from mariemat/ZOOKEEPER-4221
…e.maxbufer size (#107) Author: Mathieu Marie <[email protected]> Reviewers: Damien Diederen <[email protected]>, Mate Szalay-Beko <[email protected]> Closes apache#1614 from mariemat/ZOOKEEPER-4221 Co-authored-by: Mathieu Marie <[email protected]>
No description provided.