ZOOKEEPER-2693: Correct the documentation about response to "ruok" 4lw #1608
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Since 5fe6850, it's no longer true that the server will either respond or not; now it can also respond that it won't obey, with the message that the command "is not executed because it is not in the whitelist", unlike what one gets if the command does not exist at all. Author: Federico Leva <[email protected]>
maoling
reviewed
Feb 21, 2021
|
maoling, 21/02/21 06:57:
How about this?
Yes that's nicer.
|
maoling
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2021
|
It's not 2021-05-10 yet:) @eolivelli Could you please merge? Thanks!!! |
|
I have merged this in P.-S. — I noticed (too late) that the ticket # was not quite about this documentation topic, but I suppose it's close enough: |
RokLenarcic
pushed a commit
to RokLenarcic/zookeeper
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2022
Since 5fe6850, it's no longer true that the server will either respond or not; now it can also respond that it won't obey, with the message that the command "is not executed because it is not in the whitelist", unlike what one gets if the command does not exist at all. Author: Federico Leva <[email protected]> Reviewers: maoling <[email protected]>, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> Closes apache#1608 from nemobis/ZOOKEEPER-2693
RokLenarcic
pushed a commit
to RokLenarcic/zookeeper
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2022
Since 5fe6850, it's no longer true that the server will either respond or not; now it can also respond that it won't obey, with the message that the command "is not executed because it is not in the whitelist", unlike what one gets if the command does not exist at all. Author: Federico Leva <[email protected]> Reviewers: maoling <[email protected]>, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> Closes apache#1608 from nemobis/ZOOKEEPER-2693
RokLenarcic
pushed a commit
to RokLenarcic/zookeeper
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2022
Since 5fe6850, it's no longer true that the server will either respond or not; now it can also respond that it won't obey, with the message that the command "is not executed because it is not in the whitelist", unlike what one gets if the command does not exist at all. Author: Federico Leva <[email protected]> Reviewers: maoling <[email protected]>, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> Closes apache#1608 from nemobis/ZOOKEEPER-2693
RokLenarcic
pushed a commit
to RokLenarcic/zookeeper
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2022
Since 5fe6850, it's no longer true that the server will either respond or not; now it can also respond that it won't obey, with the message that the command "is not executed because it is not in the whitelist", unlike what one gets if the command does not exist at all. Author: Federico Leva <[email protected]> Reviewers: maoling <[email protected]>, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> Closes apache#1608 from nemobis/ZOOKEEPER-2693
RokLenarcic
pushed a commit
to RokLenarcic/zookeeper
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2022
Since 5fe6850, it's no longer true that the server will either respond or not; now it can also respond that it won't obey, with the message that the command "is not executed because it is not in the whitelist", unlike what one gets if the command does not exist at all. Author: Federico Leva <[email protected]> Reviewers: maoling <[email protected]>, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> Closes apache#1608 from nemobis/ZOOKEEPER-2693
anuragmadnawat1
pushed a commit
to anuragmadnawat1/zookeeper
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2022
Since 5fe6850, it's no longer true that the server will either respond or not; now it can also respond that it won't obey, with the message that the command "is not executed because it is not in the whitelist", unlike what one gets if the command does not exist at all. Author: Federico Leva <[email protected]> Reviewers: maoling <[email protected]>, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> Closes apache#1608 from nemobis/ZOOKEEPER-2693
anuragmadnawat1
added a commit
to anuragmadnawat1/zookeeper
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2022
#113) Since 5fe6850, it's no longer true that the server will either respond or not; now it can also respond that it won't obey, with the message that the command "is not executed because it is not in the whitelist", unlike what one gets if the command does not exist at all. Author: Federico Leva <[email protected]> Reviewers: maoling <[email protected]>, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> Closes apache#1608 from nemobis/ZOOKEEPER-2693 Co-authored-by: Federico Leva <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since 5fe6850, it's no longer true that the server will either respond
or not; now it can also respond that it won't obey, with the message that
the command "is not executed because it is not in the whitelist", unlike
what one gets if the command does not exist at all.
Author: Federico Leva [email protected]