Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Frontend][MXNet] Change mxnet graph traversal from recursion to iteration #2007

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 29, 2018

Conversation

icemelon
Copy link
Member

Previous _from_mxnet_impl uses recursion to traverse graph. It causes call stack overflow when there're too many symbols in the graph. Now create symbols using topological order.

@icemelon icemelon requested a review from zhreshold October 26, 2018 22:36
else:
node = _sym.Variable(name=name, **attr)
graph[name] = node
return [get_node(sym) for sym in symbol]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

list is not a valid symbol, it's actually a GroupSymbol? Also here should assert if node is not None

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed

@tqchen
Copy link
Member

tqchen commented Oct 29, 2018

Thanks @icemelon9 , @zhreshold can you take another look?

@zhreshold
Copy link
Member

@icemelon9 Thanks, LGTM now.

@tqchen tqchen merged commit 25e4dc5 into apache:master Oct 29, 2018
@tqchen
Copy link
Member

tqchen commented Oct 29, 2018

Thanks @icemelon9 @zhreshold ! this is now merged

FrozenGene pushed a commit to FrozenGene/tvm that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2018
wweic pushed a commit to neo-ai/tvm that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2019
wweic pushed a commit to neo-ai/tvm that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants