Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Update ci_arm docker image to have LLVM 15 #14296

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2023
Merged

Conversation

leandron
Copy link
Contributor

@leandron leandron commented Mar 14, 2023

Update ci_arm to have support for LLVM 15, which brings better support for vectorisation.
The proposed docker tag is: 20230314-060145-ccc0b9162.

cc @Mousius @neildhickey @lhutton1 for reviews

@tvm-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

tvm-bot commented Mar 14, 2023

Thanks for contributing to TVM! Please refer to the contributing guidelines https://tvm.apache.org/docs/contribute/ for useful information and tips. Please request code reviews from Reviewers by @-ing them in a comment.

Generated by tvm-bot

@neildhickey
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM!

* LLVM 15 brings better support for vectorization

Co-Authored-By: neildhickey <[email protected]>
Change-Id: I7ac96efccaa5bbff4b637f41fa5a19ad36cb91dd
@leandron leandron force-pushed the docker_llvm_15_update branch from e692ae3 to 895f55d Compare March 14, 2023 16:47
@leandron leandron changed the title [Do not merge][CI] Update ci_arm docker image to have LLVM 15 [CI] Update ci_arm docker image to have LLVM 15 Mar 14, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@lhutton1 lhutton1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @leandron!

@lhutton1 lhutton1 merged commit 5d05092 into main Mar 15, 2023
@lhutton1
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @leandron @neildhickey @driazati!

@lhutton1 lhutton1 deleted the docker_llvm_15_update branch March 15, 2023 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants