Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Refactor ownership #21938

Merged

Conversation

john-bodley
Copy link
Member

SUMMARY

A follow up to #20499 where the actor field was deprecated given this is simply the current logged in user.

BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

CI.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • Has associated issue:
  • Required feature flags:
  • Changes UI
  • Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
    • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
    • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
    • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
  • Introduces new feature or API
  • Removes existing feature or API

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 25, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #21938 (4d546c7) into master (9a063ab) will increase coverage by 11.37%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #21938       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   55.55%   66.92%   +11.37%     
===========================================
  Files        1806     1806               
  Lines       69140    69156       +16     
  Branches     7393     7393               
===========================================
+ Hits        38409    46284     +7875     
+ Misses      28822    20963     -7859     
  Partials     1909     1909               
Flag Coverage Δ
hive 52.92% <50.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
mysql 78.37% <100.00%> (?)
postgres 78.43% <100.00%> (?)
presto 52.83% <50.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
python 81.49% <100.00%> (+23.54%) ⬆️
sqlite 76.92% <100.00%> (?)
unit 51.08% <50.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
superset/datasets/api.py 87.39% <100.00%> (+38.21%) ⬆️
superset/datasets/commands/duplicate.py 90.90% <100.00%> (+61.79%) ⬆️
superset/config.py 91.69% <0.00%> (+0.63%) ⬆️
superset/views/database/views.py 31.36% <0.00%> (+0.90%) ⬆️
superset/sql_parse.py 96.49% <0.00%> (+1.16%) ⬆️
superset/db_engine_specs/__init__.py 85.71% <0.00%> (+1.19%) ⬆️
superset/tables/models.py 67.53% <0.00%> (+1.29%) ⬆️
superset/exceptions.py 90.43% <0.00%> (+1.73%) ⬆️
superset/reports/models.py 100.00% <0.00%> (+2.00%) ⬆️
superset/explore/utils.py 100.00% <0.00%> (+2.27%) ⬆️
... and 285 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@john-bodley john-bodley force-pushed the john-bodley--deprecate-actor branch from 62a662e to 4d546c7 Compare October 26, 2022 00:01
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ def duplicate(self) -> Response:
return self.response_400(message=error.messages)

try:
new_model = DuplicateDatasetCommand([g.user.id], item).run()
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was wrong. It was passing in a List[int] whereas the class signature expected User. I'm somewhat perplexed as to why Mypy didn't report this an error. See this Slack thread for details.

@@ -122,7 +120,7 @@ def validate(self) -> None:
exceptions.append(DatasetExistsValidationError(table_name=duplicate_name))

try:
owners = self.populate_owners(self._actor)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See the previous comment. I gather Mypy didn't barf because it was being passed List[int] as opposed to User per the class __init__ method.

Note, per here there's no need to specify [g.user.id] given that it defaults to the current user if not specified.

Copy link
Member

@villebro villebro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried to think of any reason for this to be passed through, but couldn't come up with any valid reason, so I must assume it's not needed. And if this does indeed break something we need to add an IT for it anyway. LGTM.

@john-bodley john-bodley merged commit 4a330a3 into apache:master Nov 2, 2022
@john-bodley john-bodley deleted the john-bodley--deprecate-actor branch November 2, 2022 08:05
@mistercrunch mistercrunch added 🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 2.1.0 and removed 🚢 2.1.3 labels Mar 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels size/S 🚢 2.1.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants