Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update proportion of memory #66

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

CrazyJvm
Copy link
Contributor

@CrazyJvm CrazyJvm commented Mar 3, 2014

The default value of "spark.storage.memoryFraction" has been changed from 0.66 to 0.6 . So it should be 60% of the memory to cache while 40% used for task execution.

the default value of "spark.storage.memoryFraction" has been change from 0.66 to 0.6 . So it should be 60% of the memory to cache while 40% used for task execution.
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Mar 3, 2014

Thanks. I've merged this.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 9d225a9 Mar 3, 2014
wli600 pushed a commit to wli600/spark that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2015
SKIPME merging Apache branch-1.4 bug fixes
JasonMWhite pushed a commit to JasonMWhite/spark that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2015
add spark streaming requirements to pomfile
marcosdotps pushed a commit to marcosdotps/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2017
* revert change hosts

* Update Jenkinsfile
cenyuhai added a commit to cenyuhai/spark that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2017
[SPARK-21414] Refine SlidingWindowFunctionFrame to avoid OOM

Refine SlidingWindowFunctionFrame to avoid OOM  
resolve apache#66 

See merge request !59
ashangit added a commit to ashangit/spark that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2018
[SPARK-22683][CORE] Allow tuning the number of dynamically allocated executors
jamesrgrinter pushed a commit to jamesrgrinter/spark that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2018
Signed-off-by: Rostyslav Sotnychenko <[email protected]>

(cherry picked from commit de237dc)
Igosuki pushed a commit to Adikteev/spark that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2018
clems4ever pushed a commit to clems4ever/spark that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2019
[SPARK-22683][CORE] Allow tuning the number of dynamically allocated executors
bzhaoopenstack pushed a commit to bzhaoopenstack/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2019
UT: dims/openstack-cloud-controller-manager + devstack [in vm]
yuexingri pushed a commit to yuexingri/spark that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2019
apache#39 performance issue in fuction getAliasedConstraints of LogicalPlan
arjunshroff pushed a commit to arjunshroff/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2020
cloud-fan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2021
…join can be planned as broadcast join

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Should not pushdown LeftSemi/LeftAnti over Aggregate for some cases.

```scala
spark.range(50000000L).selectExpr("id % 10000 as a", "id % 10000 as b").write.saveAsTable("t1")
spark.range(40000000L).selectExpr("id % 8000 as c", "id % 8000 as d").write.saveAsTable("t2")
spark.sql("SELECT distinct a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT distinct c, d FROM t2").explain
```

Before this pr:
```
== Physical Plan ==
AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=false
+- HashAggregate(keys=[a#16L, b#17L], functions=[])
   +- HashAggregate(keys=[a#16L, b#17L], functions=[])
      +- HashAggregate(keys=[a#16L, b#17L], functions=[])
         +- Exchange hashpartitioning(a#16L, b#17L, 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#72]
            +- HashAggregate(keys=[a#16L, b#17L], functions=[])
               +- SortMergeJoin [coalesce(a#16L, 0), isnull(a#16L), coalesce(b#17L, 0), isnull(b#17L)], [coalesce(c#18L, 0), isnull(c#18L), coalesce(d#19L, 0), isnull(d#19L)], LeftSemi
                  :- Sort [coalesce(a#16L, 0) ASC NULLS FIRST, isnull(a#16L) ASC NULLS FIRST, coalesce(b#17L, 0) ASC NULLS FIRST, isnull(b#17L) ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
                  :  +- Exchange hashpartitioning(coalesce(a#16L, 0), isnull(a#16L), coalesce(b#17L, 0), isnull(b#17L), 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#65]
                  :     +- FileScan parquet default.t1[a#16L,b#17L] Batched: true, DataFilters: [], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/Users/yumwang/spark/spark-warehouse/org.apache.spark.sql.Data..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [], ReadSchema: struct<a:bigint,b:bigint>
                  +- Sort [coalesce(c#18L, 0) ASC NULLS FIRST, isnull(c#18L) ASC NULLS FIRST, coalesce(d#19L, 0) ASC NULLS FIRST, isnull(d#19L) ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
                     +- Exchange hashpartitioning(coalesce(c#18L, 0), isnull(c#18L), coalesce(d#19L, 0), isnull(d#19L), 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#66]
                        +- HashAggregate(keys=[c#18L, d#19L], functions=[])
                           +- Exchange hashpartitioning(c#18L, d#19L, 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#61]
                              +- HashAggregate(keys=[c#18L, d#19L], functions=[])
                                 +- FileScan parquet default.t2[c#18L,d#19L] Batched: true, DataFilters: [], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/Users/yumwang/spark/spark-warehouse/org.apache.spark.sql.Data..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [], ReadSchema: struct<c:bigint,d:bigint>
```

After this pr:
```
== Physical Plan ==
AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=false
+- HashAggregate(keys=[a#16L, b#17L], functions=[])
   +- Exchange hashpartitioning(a#16L, b#17L, 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#74]
      +- HashAggregate(keys=[a#16L, b#17L], functions=[])
         +- SortMergeJoin [coalesce(a#16L, 0), isnull(a#16L), coalesce(b#17L, 0), isnull(b#17L)], [coalesce(c#18L, 0), isnull(c#18L), coalesce(d#19L, 0), isnull(d#19L)], LeftSemi
            :- Sort [coalesce(a#16L, 0) ASC NULLS FIRST, isnull(a#16L) ASC NULLS FIRST, coalesce(b#17L, 0) ASC NULLS FIRST, isnull(b#17L) ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
            :  +- Exchange hashpartitioning(coalesce(a#16L, 0), isnull(a#16L), coalesce(b#17L, 0), isnull(b#17L), 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#67]
            :     +- HashAggregate(keys=[a#16L, b#17L], functions=[])
            :        +- Exchange hashpartitioning(a#16L, b#17L, 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#61]
            :           +- HashAggregate(keys=[a#16L, b#17L], functions=[])
            :              +- FileScan parquet default.t1[a#16L,b#17L] Batched: true, DataFilters: [], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/Users/yumwang/spark/spark-warehouse/org.apache.spark.sql.Data..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [], ReadSchema: struct<a:bigint,b:bigint>
            +- Sort [coalesce(c#18L, 0) ASC NULLS FIRST, isnull(c#18L) ASC NULLS FIRST, coalesce(d#19L, 0) ASC NULLS FIRST, isnull(d#19L) ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
               +- Exchange hashpartitioning(coalesce(c#18L, 0), isnull(c#18L), coalesce(d#19L, 0), isnull(d#19L), 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#68]
                  +- HashAggregate(keys=[c#18L, d#19L], functions=[])
                     +- Exchange hashpartitioning(c#18L, d#19L, 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#63]
                        +- HashAggregate(keys=[c#18L, d#19L], functions=[])
                           +- FileScan parquet default.t2[c#18L,d#19L] Batched: true, DataFilters: [], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/Users/yumwang/spark/spark-warehouse/org.apache.spark.sql.Data..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [], ReadSchema: struct<c:bigint,d:bigint>
```

### Why are the changes needed?

1. Pushdown LeftSemi/LeftAnti over Aggregate will affect performance.
2. It will remove user added DISTINCT operator, e.g.: [q38](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/test/resources/tpcds/q38.sql), [q87](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/test/resources/tpcds/q87.sql).

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit test and benchmark test.

SQL | Before this PR(Seconds) | After this PR(Seconds)
-- | -- | --
q14a | 660 | 594
q14b | 660 | 600
q38 | 55 | 29
q87 | 66 | 35

Before this pr:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5399861/104452849-8789fc80-55de-11eb-88da-44059899f9a9.png)

After this pr:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5399861/104452899-9a043600-55de-11eb-9286-d8f3a23ca3b8.png)

Closes #31145 from wangyum/SPARK-34081.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
dongjoon-hyun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
…r `postgreSQL/float4.sql` and `postgreSQL/int8.sql`

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr regenerate Java 21 golden file for `postgreSQL/float4.sql` and `postgreSQL/int8.sql` to fix Java 21 daily test.

### Why are the changes needed?
Fix Java 21 daily test:
- https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/10823897095/job/30030200710

```
[info] - postgreSQL/float4.sql *** FAILED *** (1 second, 100 milliseconds)
[info]   postgreSQL/float4.sql
[info]   Expected "...arameters" : {
[info]       "[ansiConfig" : "\"spark.sql.ansi.enabled\"",
[info]       "]expression" : "'N A ...", but got "...arameters" : {
[info]       "[]expression" : "'N A ..." Result did not match for query #11
[info]   SELECT float('N A N') (SQLQueryTestSuite.scala:663)
...
[info] - postgreSQL/int8.sql *** FAILED *** (2 seconds, 474 milliseconds)
[info]   postgreSQL/int8.sql
[info]   Expected "...arameters" : {
[info]       "[ansiConfig" : "\"spark.sql.ansi.enabled\"",
[info]       "]sourceType" : "\"BIG...", but got "...arameters" : {
[info]       "[]sourceType" : "\"BIG..." Result did not match for query #66
[info]   SELECT CAST(q1 AS int) FROM int8_tbl WHERE q2 <> 456 (SQLQueryTestSuite.scala:663)
...
[info] *** 2 TESTS FAILED ***
[error] Failed: Total 3559, Failed 2, Errors 0, Passed 3557, Ignored 4
[error] Failed tests:
[error] 	org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQueryTestSuite
[error] (sql / Test / test) sbt.TestsFailedException: Tests unsuccessful
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
- Pass Github Acitons
- Manual checked: `build/sbt "sql/testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQueryTestSuite" with Java 21, all test passed
`

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No

Closes #48089 from LuciferYang/SPARK-49578-FOLLOWUP.

Authored-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
attilapiros pushed a commit to attilapiros/spark that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
…r `postgreSQL/float4.sql` and `postgreSQL/int8.sql`

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr regenerate Java 21 golden file for `postgreSQL/float4.sql` and `postgreSQL/int8.sql` to fix Java 21 daily test.

### Why are the changes needed?
Fix Java 21 daily test:
- https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/10823897095/job/30030200710

```
[info] - postgreSQL/float4.sql *** FAILED *** (1 second, 100 milliseconds)
[info]   postgreSQL/float4.sql
[info]   Expected "...arameters" : {
[info]       "[ansiConfig" : "\"spark.sql.ansi.enabled\"",
[info]       "]expression" : "'N A ...", but got "...arameters" : {
[info]       "[]expression" : "'N A ..." Result did not match for query apache#11
[info]   SELECT float('N A N') (SQLQueryTestSuite.scala:663)
...
[info] - postgreSQL/int8.sql *** FAILED *** (2 seconds, 474 milliseconds)
[info]   postgreSQL/int8.sql
[info]   Expected "...arameters" : {
[info]       "[ansiConfig" : "\"spark.sql.ansi.enabled\"",
[info]       "]sourceType" : "\"BIG...", but got "...arameters" : {
[info]       "[]sourceType" : "\"BIG..." Result did not match for query apache#66
[info]   SELECT CAST(q1 AS int) FROM int8_tbl WHERE q2 <> 456 (SQLQueryTestSuite.scala:663)
...
[info] *** 2 TESTS FAILED ***
[error] Failed: Total 3559, Failed 2, Errors 0, Passed 3557, Ignored 4
[error] Failed tests:
[error] 	org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQueryTestSuite
[error] (sql / Test / test) sbt.TestsFailedException: Tests unsuccessful
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
- Pass Github Acitons
- Manual checked: `build/sbt "sql/testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQueryTestSuite" with Java 21, all test passed
`

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No

Closes apache#48089 from LuciferYang/SPARK-49578-FOLLOWUP.

Authored-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
himadripal pushed a commit to himadripal/spark that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2024
…r `postgreSQL/float4.sql` and `postgreSQL/int8.sql`

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr regenerate Java 21 golden file for `postgreSQL/float4.sql` and `postgreSQL/int8.sql` to fix Java 21 daily test.

### Why are the changes needed?
Fix Java 21 daily test:
- https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/10823897095/job/30030200710

```
[info] - postgreSQL/float4.sql *** FAILED *** (1 second, 100 milliseconds)
[info]   postgreSQL/float4.sql
[info]   Expected "...arameters" : {
[info]       "[ansiConfig" : "\"spark.sql.ansi.enabled\"",
[info]       "]expression" : "'N A ...", but got "...arameters" : {
[info]       "[]expression" : "'N A ..." Result did not match for query apache#11
[info]   SELECT float('N A N') (SQLQueryTestSuite.scala:663)
...
[info] - postgreSQL/int8.sql *** FAILED *** (2 seconds, 474 milliseconds)
[info]   postgreSQL/int8.sql
[info]   Expected "...arameters" : {
[info]       "[ansiConfig" : "\"spark.sql.ansi.enabled\"",
[info]       "]sourceType" : "\"BIG...", but got "...arameters" : {
[info]       "[]sourceType" : "\"BIG..." Result did not match for query apache#66
[info]   SELECT CAST(q1 AS int) FROM int8_tbl WHERE q2 <> 456 (SQLQueryTestSuite.scala:663)
...
[info] *** 2 TESTS FAILED ***
[error] Failed: Total 3559, Failed 2, Errors 0, Passed 3557, Ignored 4
[error] Failed tests:
[error] 	org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQueryTestSuite
[error] (sql / Test / test) sbt.TestsFailedException: Tests unsuccessful
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
- Pass Github Acitons
- Manual checked: `build/sbt "sql/testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQueryTestSuite" with Java 21, all test passed
`

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No

Closes apache#48089 from LuciferYang/SPARK-49578-FOLLOWUP.

Authored-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants