-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-23326][WEBUI]schedulerDelay should return 0 when the task is running #20493
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more | ||
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with | ||
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. | ||
* The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 | ||
* (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with | ||
* the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
* | ||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
* limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
package org.apache.spark.status | ||
|
||
import java.util.Date | ||
|
||
import org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite | ||
import org.apache.spark.status.api.v1.{TaskData, TaskMetrics} | ||
|
||
class AppStatusUtilsSuite extends SparkFunSuite { | ||
|
||
test("schedulerDelay") { | ||
val runningTask = new TaskData( | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can we make this test case more concise and easy to read by deduplication? Seq(("RUNNING", 0), ("SUCCESS", 3L)).foreach { case (status, schedulerDelay) =>
// the code from `finishedTask`
} There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. +1 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. +1 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Actually there are many different values between these 2 code blocks
I think it's OK keep the code as it is. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, I'm inclined to keep it as they are more real. |
||
taskId = 0, | ||
index = 0, | ||
attempt = 0, | ||
launchTime = new Date(1L), | ||
resultFetchStart = None, | ||
duration = Some(100L), | ||
executorId = "1", | ||
host = "localhost", | ||
status = "RUNNING", | ||
taskLocality = "PROCESS_LOCAL", | ||
speculative = false, | ||
accumulatorUpdates = Nil, | ||
errorMessage = None, | ||
taskMetrics = Some(new TaskMetrics( | ||
executorDeserializeTime = 0L, | ||
executorDeserializeCpuTime = 0L, | ||
executorRunTime = 0L, | ||
executorCpuTime = 0L, | ||
resultSize = 0L, | ||
jvmGcTime = 0L, | ||
resultSerializationTime = 0L, | ||
memoryBytesSpilled = 0L, | ||
diskBytesSpilled = 0L, | ||
peakExecutionMemory = 0L, | ||
inputMetrics = null, | ||
outputMetrics = null, | ||
shuffleReadMetrics = null, | ||
shuffleWriteMetrics = null))) | ||
assert(AppStatusUtils.schedulerDelay(runningTask) === 0L) | ||
|
||
val finishedTask = new TaskData( | ||
taskId = 0, | ||
index = 0, | ||
attempt = 0, | ||
launchTime = new Date(1L), | ||
resultFetchStart = None, | ||
duration = Some(100L), | ||
executorId = "1", | ||
host = "localhost", | ||
status = "SUCCESS", | ||
taskLocality = "PROCESS_LOCAL", | ||
speculative = false, | ||
accumulatorUpdates = Nil, | ||
errorMessage = None, | ||
taskMetrics = Some(new TaskMetrics( | ||
executorDeserializeTime = 5L, | ||
executorDeserializeCpuTime = 3L, | ||
executorRunTime = 90L, | ||
executorCpuTime = 10L, | ||
resultSize = 100L, | ||
jvmGcTime = 10L, | ||
resultSerializationTime = 2L, | ||
memoryBytesSpilled = 0L, | ||
diskBytesSpilled = 0L, | ||
peakExecutionMemory = 100L, | ||
inputMetrics = null, | ||
outputMetrics = null, | ||
shuffleReadMetrics = null, | ||
shuffleWriteMetrics = null))) | ||
assert(AppStatusUtils.schedulerDelay(finishedTask) === 3L) | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
task.duration.isDefined
should be redundant now, right?(I remember the duration didn't use to be set for running tasks, so this code worked, but apparently it changed while I worked on these changes...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Logically
duration
should be set for running tasks, to indicate how long a task has been run.I feel it's safer to keep
task.duration.isDefined
, as we calltask.duration.get
below.