-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-23063][K8S] K8s changes for publishing scripts (and a couple of other misses) #20256
Conversation
Test build #86076 has finished for PR 20256 at commit
|
dev/create-release/releaseutils.py
Outdated
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ def get_commits(tag): | |||
"graphx": "GraphX", | |||
"input/output": CORE_COMPONENT, | |||
"java api": "Java API", | |||
"kubernetes": "Kubernetes", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is for the PR title [foo] - I think [k8s] is more widely used, maybe both
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we supply a list/tuple there? I've updated it to K8S
, but sometimes folks have written k8s
or kubernetes
in the PR titles by the looks of it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so looks like this is for both commit title and JIRA component field... which isn't quite perfect (for example, not R here, among other things)
but in any case, multiple left values can map to the same right value, it looks like
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, okay, I misread that previously - updated the mapping, and it looks like the script turns things to lower case anyway, so k8s
and kubernetes
ought to cover everything. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, I think this looks right
Test build #86077 has finished for PR 20256 at commit
|
Test build #86084 has finished for PR 20256 at commit
|
Test build #86086 has finished for PR 20256 at commit
|
Can someone trigger a retest please? |
Test build #4046 has finished for PR 20256 at commit
|
verified changes to the release scripts and a did simple grep check -- both LGTM. Thanks! |
thanks! merged to master/2.3 |
…f other misses) ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Including the `-Pkubernetes` flag in a few places it was missed. ## How was this patch tested? checkstyle, mima through manual tests. Author: foxish <[email protected]> Closes #20256 from foxish/SPARK-23063. (cherry picked from commit c3548d1) Signed-off-by: Felix Cheung <[email protected]>
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Including the
-Pkubernetes
flag in a few places it was missed.How was this patch tested?
checkstyle, mima through manual tests.