Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-22855][BUILD] Add -no-java-comments to sbt docs/scalacOptions #20042

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

easel
Copy link
Contributor

@easel easel commented Dec 21, 2017

Prevents Scala 2.12 scaladoc from blowing up attempting to parse java comments.

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Adds -no-java-comments to docs/scalacOptions under Scala 2.12. Also
moves scaladoc configs out of the TestSettings and into the standard sharedSettings
section in SparkBuild.scala.

How was this patch tested?

SBT_OPTS=-Dscala-2.12 sbt
++2.12.4
tags/publishLocal

…on scala 2.12

Prevents Scala 2.12 scaladoc from blowing up attempting to parse java comments. Also
moves scaladoc configs out of the TestSettings and into the standard sharedSettings
section in SparkBuild.scala.
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 21, 2017

Test build #4021 has finished for PR 20042 at commit 9f3407a.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 21, 2017

Test build #85256 has finished for PR 20042 at commit 9f3407a.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Dec 21, 2017

Merged to master

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 4c2efde Dec 21, 2017
@easel
Copy link
Contributor Author

easel commented Dec 21, 2017

Thanks @srowen!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants