-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-3359][DOCS] Make javadoc8 working for unidoc/genjavadoc compatibility in Java API documentation #16013
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
aa2dcb8
Fix errors (first round)
HyukjinKwon aa5acbb
Fix errors (second round)
HyukjinKwon ff17c3a
Fix errors (third round)
HyukjinKwon 1593545
Fix the linelength style in KafkaUtils.scala
HyukjinKwon 558d5e3
Fix errors (fourth round)
HyukjinKwon 9a9d0cd
Fix errors (last round)
HyukjinKwon 842a738
Fix more errors
HyukjinKwon 3660317
Make markdown pretty for some links
HyukjinKwon 22bfb68
Keep original style without new indentations
HyukjinKwon 73fcd35
Use throws annotation
HyukjinKwon 246bef3
Print < and > properly within this PR
HyukjinKwon a2a2011
Fix other existing ones for < and >
HyukjinKwon ee3b96b
Make sql parameter pretty in JdbcRDD
HyukjinKwon 65d8f79
Fix nits and markdown
HyukjinKwon 2defa60
Revert the change not in the API documentation
HyukjinKwon d2c6e86
Address comments (rebased for reviewing)
HyukjinKwon 7d44dc5
Fix a typo and remove chekced exception annotation
HyukjinKwon File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, InterruptedException is in
java.lang
so I am surprised it isn't found. Does it help if you write@throws java.lang.InterruptedException
? that's better if it worksThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, I will try!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm.. interesting. I haven't looked into this deeper but it seems it fails anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, so it's just complaining that it's documented as a checked exception but can't be thrown according to the byte code. It has a point there, but I am also kind of surprised it's an error. OK Leave it the way you have it as it seems like it's the only way that works.