Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SOLR-17583: Bring back documentation for Adding Custom Expressions #2905

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

cfeldmann
Copy link
Contributor

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17583

Description

The section for adding Custom Expressions was removed in Solr 8.8. This change brings it back.

Solution

This change was cherry-picked from the same change on the main branch.

Tests

I ran ./gradlew tidy updateLicenses check -x test and then opened my local copy of the Reference Guide. I verified that I see the new text and that the link to the Expressible javadoc is working.

Checklist

Please review the following and check all that apply:

  • [ x] I have reviewed the guidelines for How to Contribute and my code conforms to the standards described there to the best of my ability.
  • [ x] I have created a Jira issue and added the issue ID to my pull request title.
  • [ x] I have given Solr maintainers access to contribute to my PR branch. (optional but recommended, not available for branches on forks living under an organisation)
  • I have developed this patch against the main branch.
  • [ x] I have run ./gradlew check.
  • I have added tests for my changes.
  • [ x] I have added documentation for the Reference Guide

…pache#2903)

The section for adding Custom Expressions was removed in Solr 8.8. This change brings it back.

Co-authored-by: Christine Feldmann <[email protected]>
@janhoy janhoy merged commit 114c163 into apache:branch_9_7 Dec 12, 2024
@cfeldmann cfeldmann deleted the SOLR-17583_for_branch_9_7 branch December 12, 2024 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants