[ISSUE #8957] Remove excess traffic and fix cache inconsistencies

[3424672656]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes

Fixes #8957
Fixes #8686

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 47.67%. Comparing base (c13f051) to head (6c4cf37).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #8958      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      47.66%   47.67%   +0.01%     
+ Complexity     11760    11748      -12     
=============================================
  Files           1303     1303              
  Lines          91064    91034      -30     
  Branches       11681    11672       -9     
=============================================
- Hits           43408    43405       -3     
+ Misses         42282    42263      -19     
+ Partials        5374     5366       -8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

[humkum]

Why is this deleted? IMO, only the first startup will make a request to the server，will not bring more network traffic.

[3424672656]

Why is this deleted? IMO, only the first startup will make a request to the server，will not bring more network traffic.

Normally, if rebalance=false is enabled, all topics will be rebalanced on the server as they are added to the topicBrokerRebalance collection, but when a network issue occurs, Some topics will be added topicClientRebalance, and this part of the client will be rebalanced in PULL.

Since it should be carried out on the server side, there is no need for this network communication, which not only brings overhead but also causes cache errors. It is better to remove this part

[3424672656]

@hill007299 @lizhimins Excuse me,Is the design here for version compatibility or is there some other consideration