[fix][test] Fix testLargeMessage doesn't respect the parameter clientSizeMaxMessageSize

[RobertIndie]

Motivation

#14382 introduced the client-side maxMessageSize for the message chunking. But the parameter clientSizeMaxMessageSize in testLargeMessage is not respected in that PR. This PR fixes this issue.

Modifications

• Respect the clientSizeMaxMessageSize. The clientSizeMaxMessageSize should not be too small because [PIP-132] Include message header size when check maxMessageSize for non-batch message on the client side. #14007 has included the metadata when calculating the chunk size.

Verifying this change

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as testLargeMessage.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

• Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
• The public API
• The schema
• The default values of configurations
• The threading model
• The binary protocol
• The REST endpoints
• The admin CLI options
• Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

• doc
• doc-required
• doc-not-needed
• doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository: RobertIndie#8

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #18452 (96153ed) into master (fdf86d3) will increase coverage by 1.50%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #18452      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     45.67%   47.17%   +1.50%     
- Complexity    10075    10418     +343     
============================================
  Files           693      693              
  Lines         67940    67942       +2     
  Branches       7273     7275       +2     
============================================
+ Hits          31030    32053    +1023     
+ Misses        33333    32313    -1020     
+ Partials       3577     3576       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	47.17% <0.00%> (+1.50%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...va/org/apache/pulsar/client/impl/ConsumerImpl.java	15.07% <0.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
...apache/pulsar/client/impl/AutoClusterFailover.java	73.33% <0.00%> (-2.23%)	⬇️
...oker/service/schema/SchemaRegistryServiceImpl.java	61.26% <0.00%> (-1.81%)	⬇️
...broker/service/schema/BookkeeperSchemaStorage.java	73.92% <0.00%> (-0.31%)	⬇️
...che/bookkeeper/mledger/impl/ManagedCursorImpl.java	37.11% <0.00%> (-0.06%)	⬇️
...pache/pulsar/broker/admin/impl/NamespacesBase.java	63.89% <0.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
...he/pulsar/client/impl/MultiTopicsConsumerImpl.java	23.07% <0.00%> (+0.12%)	⬆️
...che/bookkeeper/mledger/impl/ManagedLedgerImpl.java	54.11% <0.00%> (+0.13%)	⬆️
...oker/service/nonpersistent/NonPersistentTopic.java	57.63% <0.00%> (+0.17%)	⬆️
.../org/apache/pulsar/broker/admin/v2/Namespaces.java	59.49% <0.00%> (+0.20%)	⬆️
... and 60 more

[tisonkun]

Thanks for taking care of this! Merging...