[pulsar-sql] Bump presto.version to run PrestoServer on JDK11+

[tisonkun]

Motivation

This is another attempt to fix #14951 without introduce workaround.

Modifications

Bump presto.version to 334.

Verifying this change

• Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If yes was chosen, please highlight the changes

• Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes)

To fix #14951. This version bump should be transparent to users.

Config option presto.version has been removed at trinodb/trino#3708. Since PrestoServer uses strict config validations, users who configure presto.version may get a fatal error when starting PrestoServer.

• The public API: (yes / no)
• The schema: (yes / no / don't know)
• The default values of configurations: (yes / no)
• The wire protocol: (yes / no)
• The rest endpoints: (yes / no)
• The admin cli options: (yes / no)
• Anything that affects deployment: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

Check the box below or label this PR directly.

Need to update docs?

• doc-required
  (Your PR needs to update docs and you will update later)

• doc-not-needed
  (Please explain why)

• doc
  (Your PR contains doc changes)

• doc-complete
  (Docs have been already added)

[tisonkun]

cc @lhotari @codelipenghui

This change comes from #14951 (comment). And I touch this module since java-version-trim-agent is the only module uses java.util.logging related to this thread.

Bump dependency version is clear and easy to maintain than introducing an in-place agent module IMO.

cc @gaoran10

[tisonkun]

All tests has passed at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/runs/6997463530. The latest commit is about test file changes. So I think CPP task failed on flaky tests.

[tisonkun]

cc @Technoboy- @eolivelli

[gaoran10]

Great work! LGTM. But there is a similar PR, maybe we could refer to this comment #14953 (review), if we want to upgrade the Trino to 334, it's better to discuss in the dev list, because the Trino 334 needs jdk11.

[tisonkun]

@gaoran10 Thanks for your inputs! I'm not aware of that PR before. Let me investigate a bit and decide whether to start a thread on dev@ or close this PR :)

[tisonkun]

@gaoran10 FYI https://lists.apache.org/thread/chhgcb127qmvsfk79f0ry3zh1tz7mfrn

[eolivelli]

LGTM

at DataStax we upgraded Presto last year, no particular issues so far

[tisonkun]

@eolivelli thanks for your review and information! That sounds great.

ping @gaoran10 @lhotari @codelipenghui

[MarvinCai]

lgtm

[tisonkun]

@codelipenghui @eolivelli @lhotari could you give this patch a final review and merge if no further concern?