add bcpkix test dependency to fix dependabot issues #1344
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
raboof
added a commit
to raboof/pekko
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2024
Currently, dependency-submission would submit all dependencies to https://github.com/apache/pekko/security/dependabot , including test dependencies. We then added explicit dependencies to the build to squash warnings about outdated test dependencies (apache#1181, apache#1313 and apache#1344). With version 3, sbt-dependency-submission now supports ignoring scopes. This PR proposes to ignore the test scope, and remove the explicit dependencies from the build. Of course, we want our developers to be secure as much as our users. From that perspective you could say we'd want to remove 'insecure' dependencies even from the test scope. In practice, however, I think it's really unlikely that a vulnerability in a test scope dependency would lead to a realistic attack on a developer. For that reason, I think ignoring this scope for dependency-submission and keeping the old dependencies in the build removes some development friction, which balances out the risk of testing with outdated dependencies. If there'd be a 'malicious' dependency out there, I expect we'd learn about it through other channels. (do we need to request sbt-dependency-submission@v3 to be whitelisted at Infra?)
raboof
added a commit
to raboof/pekko
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2024
Currently, dependency-submission would submit all dependencies to https://github.com/apache/pekko/security/dependabot , including test dependencies. We then added explicit dependencies to the build to squash warnings about outdated test dependencies (apache#1181, apache#1313 and apache#1344). With version 3, sbt-dependency-submission now supports ignoring scopes. This PR proposes to ignore the test scope, and remove the explicit dependencies from the build. Of course, we want our developers to be secure as much as our users. From that perspective you could say we'd want to remove 'insecure' dependencies even from the test scope. In practice, however, I think it's really unlikely that a vulnerability in a test scope dependency would lead to a realistic attack on a developer. For that reason, I think ignoring this scope for dependency-submission and keeping the old dependencies in the build removes some development friction, which balances out the risk of testing with outdated dependencies. If there'd be a 'malicious' dependency out there, I expect we'd learn about it through other channels. (do we need to request sbt-dependency-submission@v3 to be whitelisted at Infra?)
raboof
added a commit
to raboof/pekko
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2024
Currently, dependency-submission would submit all dependencies to https://github.com/apache/pekko/security/dependabot , including test dependencies. We then added explicit dependencies to the build to squash warnings about outdated test dependencies (apache#1181, apache#1313 and apache#1344). With version 3, sbt-dependency-submission now supports ignoring scopes. This PR proposes to ignore the test scope, and remove the explicit dependencies from the build. Of course, we want our developers to be secure as much as our users. From that perspective you could say we'd want to remove 'insecure' dependencies even from the test scope. In practice, however, I think it's really unlikely that a vulnerability in a test scope dependency would lead to a realistic attack on a developer. For that reason, I think ignoring this scope for dependency-submission and keeping the old dependencies in the build removes some development friction, which balances out the risk of testing with outdated dependencies. If there'd be a 'malicious' dependency out there, I expect we'd learn about it through other channels. (do we need to request sbt-dependency-submission@v3 to be whitelisted at Infra?)
raboof
added a commit
to raboof/pekko
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2024
Currently, dependency-submission would submit all dependencies to https://github.com/apache/pekko/security/dependabot , including test dependencies. We then added explicit dependencies to the build to squash warnings about outdated test dependencies (apache#1181, apache#1313 and apache#1344). With version 3, sbt-dependency-submission now supports ignoring scopes. This PR proposes to ignore the test scope, and remove the explicit dependencies from the build. Of course, we want our developers to be secure as much as our users. From that perspective you could say we'd want to remove 'insecure' dependencies even from the test scope. In practice, however, I think it's really unlikely that a vulnerability in a test scope dependency would lead to a realistic attack on a developer. For that reason, I think ignoring this scope for dependency-submission and keeping the old dependencies in the build removes some development friction, which balances out the risk of testing with outdated dependencies. If there'd be a 'malicious' dependency out there, I expect we'd learn about it through other channels.
raboof
added a commit
to raboof/pekko
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2024
Currently, dependency-submission would submit all dependencies to https://github.com/apache/pekko/security/dependabot , including test dependencies. We then added explicit dependencies to the build to squash warnings about outdated test dependencies (apache#1181, apache#1313 and apache#1344). With version 3, sbt-dependency-submission now supports ignoring scopes. This PR proposes to ignore the test scope, and remove the explicit dependencies from the build. Of course, we want our developers to be secure as much as our users. From that perspective you could say we'd want to remove 'insecure' dependencies even from the test scope. In practice, however, I think it's really unlikely that a vulnerability in a test scope dependency would lead to a realistic attack on a developer. For that reason, I think ignoring this scope for dependency-submission and keeping the old dependencies in the build removes some development friction, which balances out the risk of testing with outdated dependencies. If there'd be a 'malicious' dependency out there, I expect we'd learn about it through other channels.
raboof
added a commit
to raboof/pekko
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2024
Currently, dependency-submission would submit all dependencies to https://github.com/apache/pekko/security/dependabot , including test dependencies. We then added explicit dependencies to the build to squash warnings about outdated test dependencies (apache#1181, apache#1313 and apache#1344). With version 3, sbt-dependency-submission now supports ignoring scopes. This PR proposes to ignore the test scope, and remove the explicit dependencies from the build. Of course, we want our developers to be secure as much as our users. From that perspective you could say we'd want to remove 'insecure' dependencies even from the test scope. In practice, however, I think it's really unlikely that a vulnerability in a test scope dependency would lead to a realistic attack on a developer. For that reason, I think ignoring this scope for dependency-submission and keeping the old dependencies in the build removes some development friction, which balances out the risk of testing with outdated dependencies. If there'd be a 'malicious' dependency out there, I expect we'd learn about it through other channels.
raboof
added a commit
to raboof/pekko
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2025
Currently, dependency-submission would submit all dependencies to https://github.com/apache/pekko/security/dependabot , including test dependencies. We then added explicit dependencies to the build to squash warnings about outdated test dependencies (apache#1181, apache#1313 and apache#1344). With version 3, sbt-dependency-submission now supports ignoring scopes. This PR proposes to ignore the test scope, and remove the explicit dependencies from the build. Of course, we want our developers to be secure as much as our users. From that perspective you could say we'd want to remove 'insecure' dependencies even from the test scope. In practice, however, I think it's really unlikely that a vulnerability in a test scope dependency would lead to a realistic attack on a developer. For that reason, I think ignoring this scope for dependency-submission and keeping the old dependencies in the build removes some development friction, which balances out the risk of testing with outdated dependencies. If there'd be a 'malicious' dependency out there, I expect we'd learn about it through other channels.
raboof
added a commit
to raboof/pekko
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2025
Currently, dependency-submission would submit all dependencies to https://github.com/apache/pekko/security/dependabot , including test dependencies. We then added explicit dependencies to the build to squash warnings about outdated test dependencies (apache#1181, apache#1313 and apache#1344). With version 3, sbt-dependency-submission now supports ignoring scopes. This PR proposes to ignore the test scope, and remove the explicit dependencies from the build. Of course, we want our developers to be secure as much as our users. From that perspective you could say we'd want to remove 'insecure' dependencies even from the test scope. In practice, however, I think it's really unlikely that a vulnerability in a test scope dependency would lead to a realistic attack on a developer. For that reason, I think ignoring this scope for dependency-submission and keeping the old dependencies in the build removes some development friction, which balances out the risk of testing with outdated dependencies. If there'd be a 'malicious' dependency out there, I expect we'd learn about it through other channels.
raboof
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2025
Currently, dependency-submission would submit all dependencies to https://github.com/apache/pekko/security/dependabot , including test dependencies. We then added explicit dependencies to the build to squash warnings about outdated test dependencies (#1181, #1313 and #1344). With version 3, sbt-dependency-submission now supports ignoring scopes. This PR proposes to ignore the test scope, and remove the explicit dependencies from the build. Of course, we want our developers to be secure as much as our users. From that perspective you could say we'd want to remove 'insecure' dependencies even from the test scope. In practice, however, I think it's really unlikely that a vulnerability in a test scope dependency would lead to a realistic attack on a developer. For that reason, I think ignoring this scope for dependency-submission and keeping the old dependencies in the build removes some development friction, which balances out the risk of testing with outdated dependencies. If there'd be a 'malicious' dependency out there, I expect we'd learn about it through other channels.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
see https://github.com/apache/pekko/security/dependabot/102, https://github.com/apache/pekko/security/dependabot/103, https://github.com/apache/pekko/security/dependabot/104