Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SOLR-17120: handle null value when merging partials (backport of solr#2214) #2683

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2024

Conversation

cpoerschke
Copy link
Contributor

* SOLR-17120 handle null value when merging partials

  - this change avoids a `NullPointerException` that can occur
    under some circumstances when performing multiple partial
    updates of the same document
@cpoerschke cpoerschke changed the title SOLR-17120: handle null value when merging partials (#2214) SOLR-17120: handle null value when merging partials (backport of solr#2214) Jan 25, 2024
Comment on lines +45 to +47
* SOLR-17120: Fix NullPointerException in UpdateLog.applyOlderUpdates that can occur if there are multiple partial
updates of the same document in separate requests using commitWithin. (Calvin Smith, Christine Poerschke)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just noting that main and branch_9x and branch_9_5 (if releasing after 8.11.3) don't have a 8.11.3 section as yet but would presumably get it in bulk as part of the 8.11.3 release process i.e. no need for individual tickets to add the entries incrementally on those branches.

Copy link
Contributor

@gerlowskija gerlowskija left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@cpoerschke cpoerschke merged commit 78e6184 into apache:branch_8_11 Jan 26, 2024
1 check passed
@cpoerschke cpoerschke deleted the branch_8_11-SOLR-17120 branch January 26, 2024 17:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants