-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KAFKA-9929: Support backward iterator on SessionStore #9139
Merged
+2,095
−152
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9d4327c
key/value reverse operation
jeqo 6761c71
window backward operations
jeqo 000c7b7
session backward operations
jeqo 1811b57
improve time range comments
jeqo 8c26756
fix bytes range validator not needed
jeqo e0d160b
fix cache iterator
jeqo ae7e3ed
fix session store to support backward queries
jeqo 64a95c0
improve format based on feedback
jeqo a875cf1
test caching store across segments
jeqo 76bb9a2
improve testing names and scenarios
jeqo e49f258
expand caching store tests per backing store
jeqo b856242
fix formatting
1932413
fix formatting
70484e4
Merge branch 'trunk' into backward-sessionstore
14fce52
fix conflict with trunk
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It won't matter to users whether this method was moved from another interface or not. They just need to know why they're getting the exception. I.e., we just need to tell them that the store implementation they selected didn't implement the method.
We should say the exact same thing in all default implementations. Right now, they're a bit inconsistent.