-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FAI-243 - improved type dependent perturbations #467
Conversation
jenkins retest this please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding some comments, can you please improve test coverage of Type
class?
https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=org.kie.kogito%3Akogito-apps&metric=new_coverage&pullRequest=467&selected=org.kie.kogito%3Akogito-apps%3Aexplainability%2Fexplainability-core%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fkie%2Fkogito%2Fexplainability%2Fmodel%2FType.java&view=list
There are many corner cases/exit conditions not covered
explainability/explainability-core/src/main/java/org/kie/kogito/explainability/model/Type.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
explainability/explainability-core/src/main/java/org/kie/kogito/explainability/model/Type.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jenkins retest this please |
jenkins retest this please |
again failing on |
jenkins retest this please |
explainability/explainability-core/src/main/java/org/kie/kogito/explainability/model/Type.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
jenkins retest this please |
1 similar comment
jenkins retest this please |
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! 0 Bugs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
* update to trusty 1.0 * update readme
Added more appropriate perturbations depending on the specific feature
Type
.see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FAI-243
Many thanks for submitting your Pull Request ❤️!
Please make sure that your PR meets the following requirements:
KOGITO-XYZ Subject
[0.9.x] KOGITO-XYZ Subject