Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add pr template #2234

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 21, 2023
Merged

chore: add pr template #2234

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 21, 2023

Conversation

liuxiaocs7
Copy link
Member

@liuxiaocs7 liuxiaocs7 commented Jun 19, 2023

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2234 (31ca276) into master (b836426) will decrease coverage by 3.62%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2234      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     68.64%   65.03%   -3.62%     
  Complexity      977      977              
============================================
  Files           498      498              
  Lines         40681    40681              
  Branches       5681     5681              
============================================
- Hits          27927    26457    -1470     
- Misses        10055    11597    +1542     
+ Partials       2699     2627      -72     

see 71 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

- [ ] Trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage. (No Need)
- [ ] Already covered by existing tests, such as *(please modify tests here)*.
- [ ] Need tests and can be verified as follows:
- xxx
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

keep "None"?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't quite understand, could you explain in more detail? :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mean that we prefer to replace "xxx" with "None" since we may not need to test manually and modify the default list.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mean that we prefer to replace "xxx" with "None" since we may not need to test manually and modify the default list.

None seems duplicate with the first option (No Need), and devs could remove it manually, we could test & enhance it later (listen the users feedback)

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@imbajin imbajin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine to me

Copy link
Contributor

@javeme javeme left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

- [ ] Trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage. (No Need)
- [ ] Already covered by existing tests, such as *(please modify tests here)*.
- [ ] Need tests and can be verified as follows:
- xxx
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mean that we prefer to replace "xxx" with "None" since we may not need to test manually and modify the default list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants