chore: correct incorrect comment

[diaohancai]

Purpose of the PR

• close [Bug] Incorrect code comment #267

Main Changes

Correct incorrect comment.

Verifying these changes

• Trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage. (No Need)
• Already covered by existing tests, such as (please modify tests here).
• Need tests and can be verified as follows.

Does this PR potentially affect the following parts?

• Nope
• Dependencies (add/update license info)
• Modify configurations
• The public API
• Other affects (typed here)

Documentation Status

• Doc - TODO
• Doc - Done
• Doc - No Need

[simon824]

LGTM

[simon824]

By the way, hugegraph-computer ci was failed and it seems not to be caused by this PR. can u help to improve it when free? (i have rerun many times) @coderzc @Radeity

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #268 (ec06513) into master (fdb4621) will increase coverage by 0.05%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #268      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     85.83%   85.89%   +0.05%     
- Complexity     3235     3236       +1     
============================================
  Files           344      344              
  Lines         12115    12115              
  Branches       1092     1092              
============================================
+ Hits          10399    10406       +7     
+ Misses         1194     1187       -7     
  Partials        522      522              

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
.../hugegraph/computer/core/common/ContainerInfo.java	90.90% <ø> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[Radeity]

By the way, hugegraph-computer ci was failed and it seems not to be caused by this PR. can u help to improve it when free? (i have rerun many times) @coderzc @Radeity

I've checked error logs and find that there's an unexpected state change, we expect to receive CANCELLED, but receive some states else. And may I ask why we have to sleep 1.5s after calling cancelJob because state may be changed to CANCELLED in this 1.5s and we will miss the state change in UT. cc @coderzc

incubator-hugegraph-computer/computer-test/src/main/java/org/apache/hugegraph/computer/k8s/MiniKubeTest.java

Lines 250 to 257 in 15fc9bb

	this.driver.cancelJob(jobId, params);
	UnitTestBase.sleep(1500L);
	DefaultJobState jobState2 = new DefaultJobState();
	jobState2.jobStatus(JobStatus.CANCELLED);
	Mockito.verify(jobObserver, Mockito.timeout(15000L).atLeast(1))
	.onJobStateChanged(Mockito.eq(jobState2));