Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[java-info] Merge java-info code into main by components step by step #478

Closed
3 tasks done
Thespica opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed
3 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Thespica
Copy link
Contributor

Thespica commented May 10, 2024

Describe the enhancement requested

Now, the java-info code basically has been completed in this branch. I am going to merge these code into main branch by components step by step:

  • basic architecture(including pom.xml and directory), yaml, type and util
  • small class like Property and AdjacentList
  • graph, vertex and edge info

Component(s)

Format, Java, Spark

@Thespica Thespica added the enhancement New feature or request label May 10, 2024
@Thespica Thespica self-assigned this May 10, 2024
@Thespica Thespica changed the title Merge java-info code into main by components step by step [java-info] Merge java-info code into main by components step by step May 10, 2024
@SemyonSinchenko
Copy link
Member

May we postpone that until we decide with proto?
(see #475 and discussion in mailing list)

@Thespica
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @SemyonSinchenko , I think this two missions are relatively independent, the merge won't effect the decision about proto.

@acezen
Copy link
Contributor

acezen commented May 10, 2024

May we postpone that until we decide with proto? (see #475 and discussion in mailing list)

I think is ok to migrate the current implementation from branch-feat-spark-java-info-refactoring to main. when the discussion about protobuf is done, we can refactoring the module on the main branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants