Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Core: Support commits with DVs #11495

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 11, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/BaseRowDelta.java
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ protected void validate(TableMetadata base, Snapshot parent) {
if (validateNewDeleteFiles) {
validateNoNewDeleteFiles(base, startingSnapshotId, conflictDetectionFilter, parent);
}

validateAddedDVs(base, startingSnapshotId, conflictDetectionFilter, parent);
}
}
}
85 changes: 83 additions & 2 deletions core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/MergingSnapshotProducer.java
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,11 +48,13 @@
import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.collect.Maps;
import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.collect.Sets;
import org.apache.iceberg.util.CharSequenceSet;
import org.apache.iceberg.util.ContentFileUtil;
import org.apache.iceberg.util.DataFileSet;
import org.apache.iceberg.util.DeleteFileSet;
import org.apache.iceberg.util.Pair;
import org.apache.iceberg.util.PartitionSet;
import org.apache.iceberg.util.SnapshotUtil;
import org.apache.iceberg.util.Tasks;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;

Expand All @@ -70,6 +72,9 @@ abstract class MergingSnapshotProducer<ThisT> extends SnapshotProducer<ThisT> {
// delete files can be added in "overwrite" or "delete" operations
private static final Set<String> VALIDATE_ADDED_DELETE_FILES_OPERATIONS =
ImmutableSet.of(DataOperations.OVERWRITE, DataOperations.DELETE);
// DVs can be added in "overwrite", "delete", and "replace" operations
private static final Set<String> VALIDATE_ADDED_DVS_OPERATIONS =
ImmutableSet.of(DataOperations.OVERWRITE, DataOperations.DELETE, DataOperations.REPLACE);

private final String tableName;
private final TableOperations ops;
Expand All @@ -83,6 +88,7 @@ abstract class MergingSnapshotProducer<ThisT> extends SnapshotProducer<ThisT> {
private final Map<Integer, DataFileSet> newDataFilesBySpec = Maps.newHashMap();
private Long newDataFilesDataSequenceNumber;
private final Map<Integer, DeleteFileSet> newDeleteFilesBySpec = Maps.newHashMap();
private final Set<String> newDVRefs = Sets.newHashSet();
private final List<ManifestFile> appendManifests = Lists.newArrayList();
private final List<ManifestFile> rewrittenAppendManifests = Lists.newArrayList();
private final SnapshotSummary.Builder addedFilesSummary = SnapshotSummary.builder();
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -245,13 +251,13 @@ private PartitionSpec spec(int specId) {

/** Add a delete file to the new snapshot. */
protected void add(DeleteFile file) {
Preconditions.checkNotNull(file, "Invalid delete file: null");
validateNewDeleteFile(file);
add(new PendingDeleteFile(file));
}

/** Add a delete file to the new snapshot. */
protected void add(DeleteFile file, long dataSequenceNumber) {
Preconditions.checkNotNull(file, "Invalid delete file: null");
validateNewDeleteFile(file);
danielcweeks marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
add(new PendingDeleteFile(file, dataSequenceNumber));
}

Expand All @@ -268,9 +274,32 @@ private void add(PendingDeleteFile file) {
if (deleteFiles.add(file)) {
addedFilesSummary.addedFile(spec, file);
hasNewDeleteFiles = true;
if (ContentFileUtil.isDV(file)) {
newDVRefs.add(file.referencedDataFile());
}
}
}

protected void validateNewDeleteFile(DeleteFile file) {
Preconditions.checkNotNull(file, "Invalid delete file: null");
Preconditions.checkArgument(formatVersion() >= 2, "Deletes are supported in V2 and above");
if (file.content() == FileContent.POSITION_DELETES) {
Preconditions.checkArgument(
formatVersion() != 2 || !ContentFileUtil.isDV(file),
danielcweeks marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
"Must not use DVs for position deletes in V2: %s",
ContentFileUtil.dvDesc(file));
Preconditions.checkArgument(
formatVersion() == 2 || ContentFileUtil.isDV(file),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same question here, why not just checking if it's DV: we know that if it's DV it's format version 3+ right ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This method validates input from the user and ensures it is not possible to add a DV to a V2 table.

"Must use DVs for position deletes in V%s: %s",
formatVersion(),
file.location());
}
}

private int formatVersion() {
return ops.current().formatVersion();
}

/** Add all files in a manifest to the new snapshot. */
protected void add(ManifestFile manifest) {
Preconditions.checkArgument(
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -769,6 +798,58 @@ protected void validateDataFilesExist(
}
}

// validates there are no concurrently added DVs for referenced data files
protected void validateAddedDVs(
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aokolnychyi aokolnychyi Nov 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This simply validates there is at most one DV per file. There would be a separate PR to automatically rewrite conflicting DVs during retries. The goal is to make DVs fully usable before optimizing.

TableMetadata base,
Long startingSnapshotId,
Expression conflictDetectionFilter,
Snapshot parent) {
// skip if there is no current table state or this operation doesn't add new DVs
if (parent == null || newDVRefs.isEmpty()) {
return;
}

Pair<List<ManifestFile>, Set<Long>> history =
validationHistory(
base,
startingSnapshotId,
VALIDATE_ADDED_DVS_OPERATIONS,
ManifestContent.DELETES,
parent);
List<ManifestFile> newDeleteManifests = history.first();
Set<Long> newSnapshotIds = history.second();

Tasks.foreach(newDeleteManifests)
.stopOnFailure()
.throwFailureWhenFinished()
.executeWith(workerPool())
.run(manifest -> validateAddedDVs(manifest, conflictDetectionFilter, newSnapshotIds));
}

private void validateAddedDVs(
ManifestFile manifest, Expression conflictDetectionFilter, Set<Long> newSnapshotIds) {
try (CloseableIterable<ManifestEntry<DeleteFile>> entries =
ManifestFiles.readDeleteManifest(manifest, ops.io(), ops.current().specsById())
.filterRows(conflictDetectionFilter)
.caseSensitive(caseSensitive)
.liveEntries()) {

for (ManifestEntry<DeleteFile> entry : entries) {
DeleteFile file = entry.file();
if (newSnapshotIds.contains(entry.snapshotId()) && ContentFileUtil.isDV(file)) {
ValidationException.check(
!newDVRefs.contains(file.referencedDataFile()),
"Found concurrently added DV for %s: %s",
file.referencedDataFile(),
ContentFileUtil.dvDesc(file));
}
}
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new UncheckedIOException(e);
}
}

// returns newly added manifests and snapshot IDs between the starting and parent snapshots
private Pair<List<ManifestFile>, Set<Long>> validationHistory(
TableMetadata base,
Long startingSnapshotId,
Expand Down
31 changes: 14 additions & 17 deletions core/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/DeleteFileIndexTestBase.java
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -53,15 +53,6 @@ public static List<Object> parameters() {
return Arrays.asList(2, 3);
}

static final DeleteFile FILE_A_POS_1 =
FileMetadata.deleteFileBuilder(SPEC)
.ofPositionDeletes()
.withPath("/path/to/data-a-pos-deletes.parquet")
.withFileSizeInBytes(10)
.withPartition(FILE_A.partition())
.withRecordCount(1)
.build();

static final DeleteFile FILE_A_EQ_1 =
FileMetadata.deleteFileBuilder(SPEC)
.ofEqualityDeletes()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -311,7 +302,7 @@ public void testUnpartitionedTableScan() throws IOException {
public void testPartitionedTableWithPartitionPosDeletes() {
table.newAppend().appendFile(FILE_A).commit();

table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(FILE_A_POS_1).commit();
table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(fileADeletes()).commit();

List<T> tasks = Lists.newArrayList(newScan(table).planFiles().iterator());
assertThat(tasks).as("Should have one task").hasSize(1);
Expand All @@ -323,7 +314,7 @@ public void testPartitionedTableWithPartitionPosDeletes() {
assertThat(task.deletes()).as("Should have one associated delete file").hasSize(1);
assertThat(task.deletes().get(0).path())
.as("Should have only pos delete file")
.isEqualTo(FILE_A_POS_1.path());
.isEqualTo(fileADeletes().path());
}

@TestTemplate
Expand All @@ -349,7 +340,7 @@ public void testPartitionedTableWithPartitionEqDeletes() {
public void testPartitionedTableWithUnrelatedPartitionDeletes() {
table.newAppend().appendFile(FILE_B).commit();

table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(FILE_A_POS_1).addDeletes(FILE_A_EQ_1).commit();
table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(fileADeletes()).addDeletes(FILE_A_EQ_1).commit();

List<T> tasks = Lists.newArrayList(newScan(table).planFiles().iterator());
assertThat(tasks).as("Should have one task").hasSize(1);
Expand All @@ -363,7 +354,9 @@ public void testPartitionedTableWithUnrelatedPartitionDeletes() {

@TestTemplate
public void testPartitionedTableWithOlderPartitionDeletes() {
table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(FILE_A_POS_1).addDeletes(FILE_A_EQ_1).commit();
assumeThat(formatVersion).as("DVs are not filtered using sequence numbers").isEqualTo(2);

table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(FILE_A_DELETES).addDeletes(FILE_A_EQ_1).commit();

table.newAppend().appendFile(FILE_A).commit();

Expand All @@ -379,6 +372,8 @@ public void testPartitionedTableWithOlderPartitionDeletes() {

@TestTemplate
public void testPartitionedTableScanWithGlobalDeletes() {
assumeThat(formatVersion).as("Requires V2 position deletes").isEqualTo(2);

table.newAppend().appendFile(FILE_A).commit();

TableMetadata base = table.ops().current();
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -407,6 +402,8 @@ public void testPartitionedTableScanWithGlobalDeletes() {

@TestTemplate
public void testPartitionedTableScanWithGlobalAndPartitionDeletes() {
assumeThat(formatVersion).as("Requires V2 position deletes").isEqualTo(2);

table.newAppend().appendFile(FILE_A).commit();

table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(FILE_A_EQ_1).commit();
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -437,7 +434,7 @@ public void testPartitionedTableScanWithGlobalAndPartitionDeletes() {

@TestTemplate
public void testPartitionedTableSequenceNumbers() {
table.newRowDelta().addRows(FILE_A).addDeletes(FILE_A_EQ_1).addDeletes(FILE_A_POS_1).commit();
table.newRowDelta().addRows(FILE_A).addDeletes(FILE_A_EQ_1).addDeletes(fileADeletes()).commit();

List<T> tasks = Lists.newArrayList(newScan(table).planFiles().iterator());
assertThat(tasks).as("Should have one task").hasSize(1);
Expand All @@ -449,7 +446,7 @@ public void testPartitionedTableSequenceNumbers() {
assertThat(task.deletes()).as("Should have one associated delete file").hasSize(1);
assertThat(task.deletes().get(0).path())
.as("Should have only pos delete file")
.isEqualTo(FILE_A_POS_1.path());
.isEqualTo(fileADeletes().path());
}

@TestTemplate
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -501,7 +498,7 @@ public void testPartitionedTableWithExistingDeleteFile() {

table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(FILE_A_EQ_1).commit();

table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(FILE_A_POS_1).commit();
table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(fileADeletes()).commit();

table
.updateProperties()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -557,7 +554,7 @@ public void testPartitionedTableWithExistingDeleteFile() {
assertThat(task.deletes()).as("Should have two associated delete files").hasSize(2);
assertThat(Sets.newHashSet(Iterables.transform(task.deletes(), ContentFile::path)))
.as("Should have expected delete files")
.isEqualTo(Sets.newHashSet(FILE_A_EQ_1.path(), FILE_A_POS_1.path()));
.isEqualTo(Sets.newHashSet(FILE_A_EQ_1.path(), fileADeletes().path()));
}

@TestTemplate
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ public void scanningWithDeletes() throws IOException {
reporter);

table.newAppend().appendFile(FILE_A).appendFile(FILE_B).appendFile(FILE_C).commit();
table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(FILE_A_DELETES).addDeletes(FILE_B_DELETES).commit();
table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(fileADeletes()).addDeletes(fileBDeletes()).commit();
ScanT tableScan = newScan(table);

try (CloseableIterable<T> fileScanTasks = tableScan.planFiles()) {
Expand All @@ -208,12 +208,19 @@ public void scanningWithDeletes() throws IOException {
assertThat(result.totalDataManifests().value()).isEqualTo(1);
assertThat(result.totalDeleteManifests().value()).isEqualTo(1);
assertThat(result.totalFileSizeInBytes().value()).isEqualTo(30L);
assertThat(result.totalDeleteFileSizeInBytes().value()).isEqualTo(20L);
assertThat(result.totalDeleteFileSizeInBytes().value())
.isEqualTo(contentSize(fileADeletes(), fileBDeletes()));
assertThat(result.skippedDataFiles().value()).isEqualTo(0);
assertThat(result.skippedDeleteFiles().value()).isEqualTo(0);
assertThat(result.indexedDeleteFiles().value()).isEqualTo(2);
assertThat(result.equalityDeleteFiles().value()).isEqualTo(0);
assertThat(result.positionalDeleteFiles().value()).isEqualTo(2);
if (formatVersion == 2) {
assertThat(result.positionalDeleteFiles().value()).isEqualTo(2);
assertThat(result.dvs().value()).isEqualTo(0);
} else {
assertThat(result.positionalDeleteFiles().value()).isEqualTo(0);
assertThat(result.dvs().value()).isEqualTo(2);
}
}

@TestTemplate
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -264,8 +271,8 @@ public void scanningWithSkippedDeleteFiles() throws IOException {
tableDir, tableName, SCHEMA, SPEC, SortOrder.unsorted(), formatVersion, reporter);
table.newAppend().appendFile(FILE_A).appendFile(FILE_B).appendFile(FILE_D).commit();
table.newOverwrite().deleteFile(FILE_A).addFile(FILE_A2).commit();
table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(FILE_A_DELETES).addDeletes(FILE_D2_DELETES).commit();
table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(FILE_B_DELETES).addDeletes(FILE_C2_DELETES).commit();
table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(fileADeletes()).addDeletes(FILE_D2_DELETES).commit();
table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(fileBDeletes()).addDeletes(FILE_C2_DELETES).commit();
ScanT tableScan = newScan(table);

List<FileScanTask> fileTasks = Lists.newArrayList();
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -308,7 +315,7 @@ public void scanningWithEqualityAndPositionalDeleteFiles() throws IOException {
tableDir, tableName, SCHEMA, SPEC, SortOrder.unsorted(), formatVersion, reporter);
table.newAppend().appendFile(FILE_A).commit();
// FILE_A_DELETES = positionalDelete / FILE_A2_DELETES = equalityDelete
table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(FILE_A_DELETES).addDeletes(FILE_A2_DELETES).commit();
table.newRowDelta().addDeletes(fileADeletes()).addDeletes(FILE_A2_DELETES).commit();
ScanT tableScan = newScan(table);

try (CloseableIterable<T> fileScanTasks =
Expand All @@ -321,7 +328,13 @@ public void scanningWithEqualityAndPositionalDeleteFiles() throws IOException {
ScanMetricsResult result = scanReport.scanMetrics();
assertThat(result.indexedDeleteFiles().value()).isEqualTo(2);
assertThat(result.equalityDeleteFiles().value()).isEqualTo(1);
assertThat(result.positionalDeleteFiles().value()).isEqualTo(1);
if (formatVersion == 2) {
assertThat(result.positionalDeleteFiles().value()).isEqualTo(1);
assertThat(result.dvs().value()).isEqualTo(0);
} else {
assertThat(result.positionalDeleteFiles().value()).isEqualTo(0);
assertThat(result.dvs().value()).isEqualTo(1);
}
}

static class TestMetricsReporter implements MetricsReporter {
Expand Down
Loading
Loading