You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This proposal aims to enhance the handling of position deletes in Iceberg. It builds on lessons learned from deploying the current approach at scale and addresses all unresolved questions from past community discussions and proposals. This effort primarily targets the V3 spec but some parts can be completed independently.
Shortcomings of position deletes we observe today:
Choosing between fewer delete files on disk (partition granularity) or targeted deletes (file granularity).
Dependence on external maintenance for consistent write and read performance.
Writing and reading overhead as in-memory and on-disk representations differ.
Proposed Change
This proposal aims to enhance the handling of position deletes in Iceberg. It builds on lessons learned from deploying the current approach at scale and addresses all unresolved questions from past community discussions and proposals. This effort primarily targets the V3 spec but some parts can be completed independently.
Shortcomings of position deletes we observe today:
Proposal document
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18Bqhr-vnzFfQk1S4AgRISkA_5_m5m32Nnc2Cw0zn2XM
Specifications
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: