Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: Create a InterSystems IRIS database type #2515

Closed
nadment opened this issue Mar 6, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2930
Closed

[Feature Request]: Create a InterSystems IRIS database type #2515

nadment opened this issue Mar 6, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2930
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@nadment
Copy link
Contributor

nadment commented Mar 6, 2023

What would you like to happen?

The old connection type for InterSystems Caché is obsolete, develop a new InterSystems Iris connection for the latest JDBC drives.

jdbc:IRIS://hostname:port/namespace

https://docs.intersystems.com/iris20223/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=BJAVNAT_globals

image

Issue Priority

Priority: 3

Issue Component

Component: Databases

@nadment nadment self-assigned this Mar 6, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the P3 Nice to have label Mar 6, 2023
@nadment nadment changed the title [Feature Request]: Create an InterSystems IRIS database type [Feature Request]: Create a InterSystems IRIS database type Mar 6, 2023
nadment added a commit to nadment/hop that referenced this issue May 14, 2023
@nadment nadment linked a pull request May 14, 2023 that will close this issue
nadment added a commit to nadment/hop that referenced this issue May 14, 2023
Change-Id: Ic339deefe90868be0986ff3ea7b935e7eced3ada
hansva added a commit to nadment/hop that referenced this issue May 16, 2023
hansva added a commit that referenced this issue May 16, 2023
Create a InterSystems IRIS database type #2515
@hansva hansva added this to the 2.5 milestone May 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants