Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HBASE-28408 Rephrase confusing log message #5718

Merged

Conversation

DieterDP-ng
Copy link
Contributor

Assume a user has a series of backups: Full1, Inc2, Inc3, where a table has not changed between Full1 and Inc3, but has changed after Inc3.
When restoring that table to Inc3, a log warning was outputted mentioning there was no need for a restore. This message in fact means there is no need for the incremental restore portion of the restore process.

Assume a user has a series of backups: Full1, Inc2, Inc3,
where a table has not changed between Full1 and Inc3,
but has changed after Inc3.
When restoring that table to Inc3, a log warning was outputted
mentioning there was no need for a restore. This message in fact
means there is no need for the incremental restore portion of
the restore process.
@Apache-HBase
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 40s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+1 💚 hbaseanti 0m 0s Patch does not have any anti-patterns.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
_ branch-2.6 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 3m 7s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 24s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 9s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 spotless 0m 44s branch has no errors when running spotless:check.
+1 💚 spotbugs 0m 29s branch-2.6 passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 2m 42s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 22s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 0m 22s the patch passed
-0 ⚠️ checkstyle 0m 7s hbase-backup: The patch generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0)
+1 💚 whitespace 0m 0s The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚 hadoopcheck 9m 36s Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.10.2 or 3.3.6.
-1 ❌ spotless 0m 38s patch has 23 errors when running spotless:check, run spotless:apply to fix.
+1 💚 spotbugs 0m 34s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 9s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
21m 20s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.43 ServerAPI=1.43 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/1/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #5718
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac spotbugs hadoopcheck hbaseanti spotless checkstyle compile
uname Linux 0e4a8b390276 5.4.0-1103-aws #111~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 23 20:04:10 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision branch-2.6 / e103736
Default Java Eclipse Adoptium-11.0.17+8
checkstyle https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/1/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/diff-checkstyle-hbase-backup.txt
spotless https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/1/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/patch-spotless.txt
Max. process+thread count 79 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-backup U: hbase-backup
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/1/console
versions git=2.34.1 maven=3.8.6 spotbugs=4.7.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 43s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 6s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --whitespace-eol-ignore-list --whitespace-tabs-ignore-list --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ branch-2.6 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 2m 55s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 19s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 5m 19s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 16s branch-2.6 passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 2m 51s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 18s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 0m 18s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 5m 18s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 14s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 9m 27s hbase-backup in the patch passed.
28m 55s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.44 ServerAPI=1.44 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/1/artifact/yetus-jdk11-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #5718
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit shadedjars compile
uname Linux d2963653820c 5.4.0-169-generic #187-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 23 14:52:28 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision branch-2.6 / e103736
Default Java Eclipse Adoptium-11.0.17+8
Test Results https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 4085 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-backup U: hbase-backup
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/1/console
versions git=2.34.1 maven=3.8.6
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 56s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 6s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --whitespace-eol-ignore-list --whitespace-tabs-ignore-list --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ branch-2.6 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 3m 6s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 18s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 5m 15s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 13s branch-2.6 passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 2m 21s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 15s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 0m 15s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 5m 27s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 20s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 10m 33s hbase-backup in the patch passed.
29m 58s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.43 ServerAPI=1.43 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/1/artifact/yetus-jdk8-hadoop2-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #5718
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit shadedjars compile
uname Linux 20438ab860df 5.4.0-1103-aws #111~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 23 20:04:10 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision branch-2.6 / e103736
Default Java Temurin-1.8.0_352-b08
Test Results https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3521 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-backup U: hbase-backup
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/1/console
versions git=2.34.1 maven=3.8.6
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 40s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+1 💚 hbaseanti 0m 0s Patch does not have any anti-patterns.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
_ branch-2.6 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 3m 5s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 28s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 13s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 spotless 0m 47s branch has no errors when running spotless:check.
+1 💚 spotbugs 0m 33s branch-2.6 passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 2m 54s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 26s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 0m 26s the patch passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 11s the patch passed
+1 💚 whitespace 0m 0s The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚 hadoopcheck 9m 25s Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.10.2 or 3.3.6.
+1 💚 spotless 0m 44s patch has no errors when running spotless:check.
+1 💚 spotbugs 0m 38s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 11s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
21m 55s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.44 ServerAPI=1.44 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/2/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #5718
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac spotbugs hadoopcheck hbaseanti spotless checkstyle compile
uname Linux f7881d8b2bef 5.4.0-172-generic #190-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 2 23:24:22 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision branch-2.6 / c8eb184
Default Java Eclipse Adoptium-11.0.17+8
Max. process+thread count 79 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-backup U: hbase-backup
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/2/console
versions git=2.34.1 maven=3.8.6 spotbugs=4.7.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 15s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 4s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --whitespace-eol-ignore-list --whitespace-tabs-ignore-list --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ branch-2.6 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 2m 28s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 17s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 4m 43s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 13s branch-2.6 passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 2m 23s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 17s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 0m 17s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 4m 41s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 13s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 9m 55s hbase-backup in the patch passed.
26m 29s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.44 ServerAPI=1.44 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/2/artifact/yetus-jdk8-hadoop2-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #5718
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit shadedjars compile
uname Linux a8abb8f4bbac 5.4.0-172-generic #190-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 2 23:24:22 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision branch-2.6 / c8eb184
Default Java Temurin-1.8.0_352-b08
Test Results https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/2/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3463 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-backup U: hbase-backup
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/2/console
versions git=2.34.1 maven=3.8.6
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 41s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 4s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --whitespace-eol-ignore-list --whitespace-tabs-ignore-list --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ branch-2.6 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 3m 2s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 17s branch-2.6 passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 5m 46s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 13s branch-2.6 passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 2m 46s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 16s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 0m 16s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 5m 39s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 12s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 8m 50s hbase-backup in the patch passed.
28m 57s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.43 ServerAPI=1.43 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/2/artifact/yetus-jdk11-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #5718
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit shadedjars compile
uname Linux 38ca57ed0d77 5.4.0-1103-aws #111~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 23 20:04:10 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision branch-2.6 / c8eb184
Default Java Eclipse Adoptium-11.0.17+8
Test Results https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/2/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3797 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-backup U: hbase-backup
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5718/2/console
versions git=2.34.1 maven=3.8.6
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@NihalJain
Copy link
Contributor

Will merge this later today.

@NihalJain NihalJain merged commit 102c1b6 into apache:branch-2.6 Mar 1, 2024
1 check passed
@NihalJain
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @DieterDP-ng thanks for the PR. I have merged this PR. But going forward, please raise PRs targeted at master first. We merge PRs in master and then backport to older branches. Let me try to forward port this change to newer branching. Will let you know if any help is needed.

NihalJain pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
Assume a user has a series of backups: Full1, Inc2, Inc3, where a table has not changed between Full1 and Inc3, but has changed after Inc3. When restoring that table to Inc3, a log warning was outputted mentioning there was no need for a restore. This message in fact means there is no need for the incremental restore portion of the restore process.

Signed-off-by: Nihal Jain <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 102c1b6)
NihalJain pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
Assume a user has a series of backups: Full1, Inc2, Inc3, where a table has not changed between Full1 and Inc3, but has changed after Inc3. When restoring that table to Inc3, a log warning was outputted mentioning there was no need for a restore. This message in fact means there is no need for the incremental restore portion of the restore process.

Signed-off-by: Nihal Jain <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 102c1b6)
NihalJain pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
Assume a user has a series of backups: Full1, Inc2, Inc3, where a table has not changed between Full1 and Inc3, but has changed after Inc3. When restoring that table to Inc3, a log warning was outputted mentioning there was no need for a restore. This message in fact means there is no need for the incremental restore portion of the restore process.

Signed-off-by: Nihal Jain <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 102c1b6)
@DieterDP-ng
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @NihalJain, I'll do so in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants