-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HBASE-27568 ChaosMonkey add support for JournalNodes #4963
Conversation
44c5aa8
to
41e7750
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
} | ||
|
||
protected void startJournalNode(ServerName server) throws IOException { | ||
getLogger().info("Starting journalnode :-{}", server.getHostname()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But :-
is removed above. I feel it is a copy-paste nit
getLogger().info("Starting journalnode :-{}", server.getHostname()); | ||
cluster.startJournalNode(server); | ||
cluster.waitForJournalNodeToStart(server, startNameNodeTimeout); | ||
getLogger().info("Started journalnode: {}", server); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ditto for the :
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
indeed :)
da42f64
to
0bf3356
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Shall we wait for the #4959, seems there are some code overlaps, and Duo is reviewing there |
0bf3356
to
ffe6f9d
Compare
@Reidddddd indeed. #4959 is merged ; I've rebased this onto latest |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Thanks @Reidddddd |
Signed-off-by: Reid Chan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Reid Chan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Reid Chan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Reid Chan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Reid Chan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Reid Chan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Reid Chan <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 181ffe7) Change-Id: I40645dac43fc1b0288b71072d7834b9ee4c5f9d9
Depends on #4959