-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HBASE-24579: Failed SASL authentication does not result in an exception on client side #1921
Merged
wchevreuil
merged 2 commits into
apache:master
from
BukrosSzabolcs:saslFailedEvaluateResponse
Jun 18, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We still have this condition? I was talking about removing this condition because with this condition, we are swallowing
IOException
other thanRemoteException
, which we don't want to do. We want to re-throw all categories ofIOException
here, not justRemoteException
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you removed the outer condition instead of
if(e instanceof RemoteException)
.Let me copy my previous comment:
I know
RemoteException
coming fromreadStatus
is imp to us but we don't want to swallow IOException ifinStream.readInt()
throws one becauseinStream.readInt()
is pre-requisite to know whether the status isSaslStatus.SUCCESS
I am talking about what is happening within
readStatus(inStream)
call.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just run a test on a test system. This time authentication was set up correctly and the goal was to see what happens in a normal usecase.
When it reached the new
readStatus(inStream);
The following exception was thrown:This is an
IOException
. This is exactly the kind of exception that we do not want to re-throw, because it is caused by the additionalreadStatus
and would not exist otherwise. The lineif(e instanceof RemoteException)
is there to filter out exceptions like this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @BukrosSzabolcs for the explanation. Got your point.