Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#4832] feat(core): Add basic framework to support multiple JDBC backend. #4833

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 5, 2024

Conversation

yuqi1129
Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi1129 yuqi1129 commented Sep 2, 2024

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

  1. Add a framework to support multiple JDBC backend
  2. Modify all the mapper classes related to metalake, catalog, schema, filesetset, table, topic and use new framework, others will use another PR to avoid a large PR.

Why are the changes needed?

To support more JDBC storage backend.

Fix: #4832

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

N/A

How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

@yuqi1129 yuqi1129 self-assigned this Sep 4, 2024
@jerryshao jerryshao merged commit e9929c8 into apache:main Sep 5, 2024
28 checks passed
yuqi1129 added a commit to yuqi1129/gravitino that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
…C backend. (apache#4833)

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

1. Add a framework to support multiple JDBC backend 
2. Modify all the mapper classes related to metalake, catalog, schema,
filesetset, table, topic and use new framework, others will use another
PR to avoid a large PR.

### Why are the changes needed?

To support more JDBC storage backend.

Fix: apache#4832 

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

N/A

### How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Improvement] Add a framework to support multiple JDBC storage backend.
2 participants