-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 382
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[#1079] improvement(CI): Modify the pipeline check logic in regards to code changes #1469
Conversation
This PR adds a check for source code changes so that the CI can determine whether to trigger the pipeline or not. Am I right? Besides, the title ' Add doc to the', the |
Not exactly. If sources change, we will run the build job. Otherwise, we will run the compile-check job. |
What's your suggestion? |
I'm not very clear about What's the difference between |
What about the title 'Modify the pipeline check logic in regards to code changes'? |
Build job will run the tests. Compile job only run the rat check, lint check and compile the code. |
ok. |
…#1281) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Compose documentation for the webUI, detailing the procedures for CRUD operations. ### Why are the changes needed? Fix: apache#1269 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? N/A ### How was this patch tested? N/A Co-authored-by: CHEYNE <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…#1270) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Compose documentation for the webUI, detailing the procedures for CRUD operations. ### Why are the changes needed? Fix: apache#1269 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? N/A ### How was this patch tested? N/A
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modify the pipeline check logic in regards to code changes
Why are the changes needed?
Fix: #1079
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Tested by own repo. qqqttt123#3