-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 383
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[#1180] feat(CI): Enable CI to test multiple JDK versions #1205
Conversation
I think we can enable all the tests currently, and optimize to use daily tests to run against jdk11 or 17 if necessary. WDYT? |
gradle/libs.versions.toml
Outdated
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ guava = "31.1-jre" | |||
lombok = "1.18.20" | |||
slf4j = "2.0.9" | |||
log4j = "2.22.0" | |||
jetty = "9.4.51.v20230217" | |||
jetty = "9.4.53.v20231009" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did we update the jetty version?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can revert the version. I bumped the version to see if it can fix the JDK17 problem I met yesterday, seems unrelated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can revert the version.
Would you revert the change here? If no modifications are made later, I will approve it now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will do it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to support multiple JDKs in github CI.
Why are the changes needed?
Fix: #1180
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.