-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 379
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Improvement] Remove RocksDBKvBackend
and related code & dependencies from code base.
#5633
Comments
RocksDBKvBackend
and related code and dependencies from code base. RocksDBKvBackend
and related code & dependencies from code base.
May I take this? |
Sure,please go on and I will assign it to you. |
@pithecuse527 just assigned, thanks for help here. |
I have a few questions as I go through the code. It would be better to clarify what I need to do.
Thank you. |
Kv Storage backend will not be supported, so we are going to remove all kv storage backend including RocksDBKvBackend.
Remove all Kv Storage backend and related kv storage backend interface and correspondingly implementation.
We will not support KV storage backend storage in the near future, so I believe we can remove it temporarily. If we plan to support it again in the future, I think we can add back or design a better one. |
<!-- 1. Title: [#<issue>] <type>(<scope>): <subject> Examples: - "[apache#123] feat(operator): support xxx" - "[apache#233] fix: check null before access result in xxx" - "[MINOR] refactor: fix typo in variable name" - "[MINOR] docs: fix typo in README" - "[apache#255] test: fix flaky test NameOfTheTest" Reference: https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/ 2. If the PR is unfinished, please mark this PR as draft. --> ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Remove Key-Value storage backend storage implementations ### Why are the changes needed? Fix: apache#5633 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? yes ### How was this patch tested? Remove tests for the Key-Value storage implementation code
What would you like to be improved?
RocksDBKvBackend
is NOT maintained by the community, so we'd better to remove the related code. the whole things could includedorg.apache.gravitino.storage.kv
and related dependency classRocksDBKvBackend
if possible.How should we improve?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: