Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Improvement] Optimize the document of access control #4754

Closed
jerqi opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4776
Closed

[Improvement] Optimize the document of access control #4754

jerqi opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4776
Assignees
Labels
improvement Improvements on everything

Comments

@jerqi
Copy link
Contributor

jerqi commented Aug 29, 2024

What would you like to be improved?

When we change from authorization false to true, we should add user first. Otherwise, it will throw error when we create catalogs.

How should we improve?

No response

@jerqi jerqi added improvement Improvements on everything 0.6.0 labels Aug 29, 2024
jerqi added a commit to qqqttt123/gravitino that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2024
jerqi added a commit to qqqttt123/gravitino that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2024
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Optimize the document of access control

### Why are the changes needed?

Fix: #4754

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?
Just docs.
jerryshao pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Optimize the document of access control

### Why are the changes needed?

Fix: #4754

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?
Just docs.

Co-authored-by: roryqi <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improvements on everything
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant