You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the AbstractIT class in the Gravitino project contains two functions, assertionsTableInfo and assertColumn, which are more utility-oriented rather than integral to the abstract test class itself.
How should we improve?
Move the two utility-oriented functions, assertionsTableInfo and assertColumn, from AbstractIT.java to ITUtils.java, and make them public.
Update all references to these functions accordingly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
…or clarity (#2900)
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move the two utility-oriented functions, assertionsTableInfo and
assertColumn, from AbstractIT.java to ITUtils.java, and make them
public.
Update all references to these functions accordingly.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the AbstractIT class in the Gravitino project contains two
functions, assertionsTableInfo and assertColumn, which are more
utility-oriented rather than integral to the abstract test class itself.
Fix: #2883
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
What would you like to be improved?
Currently, the
AbstractIT
class in the Gravitino project contains two functions,assertionsTableInfo
andassertColumn
, which are more utility-oriented rather than integral to the abstract test class itself.How should we improve?
Move the two utility-oriented functions,
assertionsTableInfo
andassertColumn
, fromAbstractIT.java
toITUtils.java
, and make them public.Update all references to these functions accordingly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: