-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GEODE-4728 - Update defaultSystem/geode.properties #275
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What GEODE ticket is this for?
defaultSystem/geode.properties
Outdated
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ | |||
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | |||
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | |||
# limitations under the License. | |||
# Default Gemfire C++ distributed system properties | |||
# Default C++ distributed system properties |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These properties are also loaded by the .NET client. I wonder if we can give them a better name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe it is just Default Geode distributed systems properties
? That way there is no reference to C++ or .NET
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Geode Native probably. This file shouldn't get confused with the one for the Java client/server.
defaultSystem/geode.properties
Outdated
# | ||
#cache-xml-file=cache.xml | ||
# | ||
## Log file config | ||
# | ||
#log-file=gemfire_cpp.log | ||
#log-file=geode_cpp.log |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here.
Hmm I thought it was GEODE-4728, but I may be off since I didn't realize it contained subtasks. |
@moleske please use the GEODE number in the PR title and at least the first commit message. |
@davebarnes97 and I stumbled upon these when looking at some documentation
My bad, was on GitHub when we saw it and forgot to check Jira before blindly updating comments |
@davebarnes97 and I stumbled upon these when looking at some documentation