-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Interop KYC and Interop Loan Disbursement #1330
Conversation
@SubhamPramanik Can you fix the checkstyle violations? |
@ApiResponse(responseCode = "200", description = "OK", content = @Content(schema = @Schema(implementation = InteropKycResponseData.class))) }) | ||
public String getClientKyc(@PathParam("accountId") @Parameter(description = "accountId") String accountId, @Context UriInfo uriInfo) { | ||
InteropKycResponseData result = interopService.getKyc(accountId); | ||
ApiRequestJsonSerializationSettings settings = this.apiRequestParameterHelper.process(uriInfo.getQueryParameters()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check permission for this action and entity (READ - CLIENTIDENTIFIER) ...context.authenticatedUser().validateHasReadPermission(ENTITY_NAME);
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure how to do it. Can you point to a refernce implementation?
@@ -437,6 +550,19 @@ private SavingsAccount validateAndGetSavingAccount(@NotNull InteropRequestData r | |||
return savingsAccount; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// private Loan validateAndGetLoan(@NotNull InteropRequestData request) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove this if you're not planning to use it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed
@SubhamPramanik thank you for the PR, I see a checkstyle error in your code, that means address_line_1 that you made does not match the required regex it should. I also see a AvoidHidingCauseException, that happens when you catch a exception and throw another exception essentially hiding what actually caused the exception! Will you fix this? cc @vorburger The checkstyles are helping!! |
30f39da
to
29b7395
Compare
@avikganguly01 looks like the review feedback from you here has been addressed? Will you re-review and merge when OK for you? Please use Squash and Merge (notice the drop-down on the green button above), as per https://github.com/apache/fineract#merge-strategy. |
Description
Describe the changes made and why they were made.
Ignore if these details are present on the associated Apache Fineract JIRA ticket.
Checklist
Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!
Write the commit message as per https://github.com/apache/fineract/#pull-requests
Acknowledge that we will not review PRs that are not passing the build ("green") - it is your responsibility to get a proposed PR to pass the build, not primarily the project's maintainers.
Create/update unit or integration tests for verifying the changes made.
Follow coding conventions at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Coding+Conventions.
Add required Swagger annotation and update API documentation at fineract-provider/src/main/resources/static/api-docs/apiLive.htm with details of any API changes
Submission is not a "code dump". (Large changes can be made "in repository" via a branch. Ask on the developer mailing list for guidance, if required.)
FYI our guidelines for code reviews are at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Code+Review+Guide.