Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement] Optimize MessageQueue #3983

Closed
2 tasks done
mxsm opened this issue May 20, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3984
Closed
2 tasks done

[Enhancement] Optimize MessageQueue #3983

mxsm opened this issue May 20, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3984
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@mxsm
Copy link
Member

mxsm commented May 20, 2023

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

Enhancement Request

Optimize MessageQueue logic and add some comments

Describe the solution you'd like

Optimize MessageQueue logic and add some comments

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
@mxsm mxsm added the enhancement New feature or request label May 20, 2023
mxsm added a commit to mxsm/incubator-eventmesh that referenced this issue May 20, 2023
mxsm added a commit to mxsm/incubator-eventmesh that referenced this issue May 22, 2023
mxsm added a commit to mxsm/incubator-eventmesh that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2023
xwm1992 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2023
* [ISSUE #3983] Optimize MessageQueue

* modify public of attribute items  to private

* optimize code readability

* optimize code logic
kyooosukedn pushed a commit to kyooosukedn/eventmesh that referenced this issue Jun 18, 2023
* [ISSUE apache#3983] Optimize MessageQueue

* modify public of attribute items  to private

* optimize code readability

* optimize code logic
@xwm1992 xwm1992 added this to the 1.9.0 milestone Jun 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants