Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix](planner) NullLiteral should always having a correct Type and set to be analyzed #43374

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

starocean999
Copy link
Contributor

@starocean999 starocean999 commented Nov 6, 2024

…t to be analyzed

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:
pick from master #43370

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No colde files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Release note

    None

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR

Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website.
See Doris Document.

@starocean999
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@morrySnow morrySnow changed the title [fix](planner) NullLiteral should always having a correct Type and se… [fix](planner) NullLiteral should always having a correct Type and set to be analyzed Nov 7, 2024
@morrySnow morrySnow merged commit d9495eb into apache:branch-3.0 Nov 7, 2024
27 of 28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants