-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[fix](build index)Fix build index failed on renamed column #42882
Conversation
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
8ae42e1
to
afa6caf
Compare
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
afa6caf
to
f79a854
Compare
run buiildall |
f79a854
to
bd43995
Compare
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
1 similar comment
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
Add `column_unique_ids` in `TOlapTableIndex` thrift struct, to get col_unique_id when building index.
Add `column_unique_ids` in `TOlapTableIndex` thrift struct, to get col_unique_id when building index.
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345" --> Introduced by #42882 <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: #42882 Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [x] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> #### TEST - Upgrade the BE first, then use build index, and it will core dump. - Manual testing shows that it doesn't core dump after the upgrade. 1. Execute ADD INDEX 2. Upgrade BE 3. Execute BUILD INDEX - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [x] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
#43044) PR Body: ## Proposed changes Add `column_unique_ids` in `TOlapTableIndex` thrift struct, to get col_unique_id when building index. Cherry-picked from #42882 Co-authored-by: qiye <[email protected]>
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close apache#12345". Otherwise, use "ref apache#12345" --> Introduced by apache#42882 <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: apache#42882 Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [x] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> #### TEST - Upgrade the BE first, then use build index, and it will core dump. - Manual testing shows that it doesn't core dump after the upgrade. 1. Execute ADD INDEX 2. Upgrade BE 3. Execute BUILD INDEX - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [x] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
…43336) ### What problem does this PR solve? This PR is a followup repair on the basis of #42882. Building index on renamed column will produce an empty index file, when `column_idx` is not found. The query is successful because match without inverted index. Move test_match_without_index to fault_injection folder and make it non-concurrent to avoid concurrency issues.
…43336) ### What problem does this PR solve? This PR is a followup repair on the basis of #42882. Building index on renamed column will produce an empty index file, when `column_idx` is not found. The query is successful because match without inverted index. Move test_match_without_index to fault_injection folder and make it non-concurrent to avoid concurrency issues.
### What problem does this PR solve? <!-- You need to clearly describe your PR in this part: 1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed. 2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be. 3. What features were added. Why this function was added. 4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was refactored. 5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization. The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and clearly understand the logic of the code modification. --> <!-- If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number. - If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use "close apache#12345". Otherwise, use "ref apache#12345" --> Introduced by apache#42882 <!-- If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that introduced by a related PR, link the PR here --> Related PR: apache#42882 Problem Summary: ### Check List (For Committer) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [x] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No colde files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> #### TEST - Upgrade the BE first, then use build index, and it will core dump. - Manual testing shows that it doesn't core dump after the upgrade. 1. Execute ADD INDEX 2. Upgrade BE 3. Execute BUILD INDEX - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - Release note <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note --> <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. --> None ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [x] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
…pache#43336) ### What problem does this PR solve? This PR is a followup repair on the basis of apache#42882. Building index on renamed column will produce an empty index file, when `column_idx` is not found. The query is successful because match without inverted index. Move test_match_without_index to fault_injection folder and make it non-concurrent to avoid concurrency issues.
…43246)(#43336) (#43266) bp #42882 #43246 #43336 We pick these PRs together because they all fix one problem and if not do so, the regression test won't be passed. --------- Co-authored-by: Sun Chenyang <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: qidaye <[email protected]>
Proposed changes
Add
column_unique_ids
inTOlapTableIndex
thrift struct, to get col_unique_id when building index.