Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement](scanner) allocate blocks in scanner_context on demand #23182

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2023

Conversation

HappenLee
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

Introduced #19389 , removed #20785

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at [email protected] by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@HappenLee
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@HappenLee
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result:
the sum of best hot time: 46.11 seconds
stream load tsv: 540 seconds loaded 74807831229 Bytes, about 132 MB/s
stream load json: 21 seconds loaded 2358488459 Bytes, about 107 MB/s
stream load orc: 65 seconds loaded 1101869774 Bytes, about 16 MB/s
stream load parquet: 31 seconds loaded 861443392 Bytes, about 26 MB/s
insert into select: 29.0 seconds inserted 10000000 Rows, about 344K ops/s
storage size: 17162203933 Bytes

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

Copy link
Contributor

@yiguolei yiguolei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 433a610 into apache:master Aug 19, 2023
16 of 17 checks passed
yiguolei pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2023
@xiaokang xiaokang mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants