[Bug] [Parameter Context] The problem of global parameter priority

[cheneychoi]

Search before asking

• I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

What happened

在kai fa we开发文档中，全局参数localParam的优先级是最低的，如图

我在测试中发现，localParam会优先级更高，下图是测试结果

What you expected to happen

最后打印出x的值应该为varpool中的lll，而不是localparam中的2

How to reproduce

按照我上面的定义即可以重新复现

Anything else

No response

Version

2.0.2

Are you willing to submit PR?

• Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

[github-actions]

Search before asking

• I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

What happened

In the kai fa we development document, the global parameter localParam has the lowest priority, as shown in the figure

I found in the test that localParam will have a higher priority, the following picture is the test result

What you expected to happen

Finally print out the value of x should be lll in varpool, not 2 in localparam

How to reproduce

It can be reproduced according to my definition above

Anything else

No response

Version

2.0.2

Are you willing to submit PR?

• Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

[github-actions]

Hi:

• Thank you for your feedback, we have received your issue, Please wait patiently for a reply.
• In order for us to understand your request as soon as possible, please provide detailed information、version or pictures.
• If you haven't received a reply for a long time, you can subscribe to the developer's email，Mail subscription steps reference https://dolphinscheduler.apache.org/en-us/community/development/subscribe.html ,Then write the issue URL in the email content and send question to [email protected].

[jim-parsons]

i tried on latest dev code and got the same result

[cheneychoi]

我已经修改了问题，提交了pr，暂时还没有得到回复！

[zhongjiajie]

I am not sure this issue is bug for code or for document, could you please take a look? @lenboo @caishunfeng . I think is it important for both codebase or document bug, so I add label core

[zhongjiajie]

IMO, I thinks it more like our documentation is out up date, and should be upgrade

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity for 30 days. It will be closed in next 7 days if no further activity occurs.

[zhongjiajie]

Remove stale

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity for 30 days. It will be closed in next 7 days if no further activity occurs.

[caishunfeng]

PTAL @Tianqi-Dotes

[Tianqi-Dotes]

the 2.0.5 and version below 2.0.5 doc illustrate the wrong priorities, please check the dev doc.
https://dolphinscheduler.apache.org/zh-cn/docs/dev/user_doc/guide/parameter/priority.html

Have fixed both the doc and code,please refer to following:
doc:apache/dolphinscheduler-website#753
code:#9379