Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Port ArrayResize to functions-array subcrate #9570

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 14, 2024
Merged

Port ArrayResize to functions-array subcrate #9570

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

erenavsarogullari
Copy link
Member

@erenavsarogullari erenavsarogullari commented Mar 12, 2024

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #9569.

What changes are included in this PR?

This PR aims to do following changes in terms of Epic #9285:
1- ArrayResize is ported to functions-array subcrate,
2- array_resize function documentation is added.

Are these changes tested?

Yes, all array.slt based array_resize tests are passed.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

@github-actions github-actions bot added logical-expr Logical plan and expressions physical-expr Physical Expressions labels Mar 12, 2024
@erenavsarogullari erenavsarogullari changed the title Port ArrayResize to function-arrays subcrate Port ArrayResize to functions-arrays subcrate Mar 12, 2024
@erenavsarogullari erenavsarogullari changed the title Port ArrayResize to functions-arrays subcrate Port ArrayResize to functions-array subcrate Mar 12, 2024
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ select log(-1), log(0), sqrt(-1);
| array_intersect(array1, array2) | Returns an array of the elements in the intersection of array1 and array2. `array_intersect([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 6, 3, 4]) -> [3, 4]` |
| array_union(array1, array2) | Returns an array of the elements in the union of array1 and array2 without duplicates. `array_union([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 6, 3, 4]) -> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]` |
| array_except(array1, array2) | Returns an array of the elements that appear in the first array but not in the second. `array_except([1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 6, 3, 4]) -> [3, 4]` |
| array_resize(array, size, value) | Resizes the list to contain size elements. Initializes new elements with value or empty if value is not set. `array_resize([1, 2, 3], 5, 0) -> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]` |
| array_resize(array, size, value) | Resizes the list to contain size elements. Initializes new elements with value or empty if value is not set. `array_resize([1, 2, 3], 5, 0) -> [1, 2, 3, 0, 0]` |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

field.data_type().clone(),
true,
)))),
_ => exec_err!(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit

Suggested change
_ => exec_err!(
List(field) | FixedSizeList(field, _) => Ok(List(field.clone())),
LargeList(field) => Ok(LargeList(field.clone())),

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addressed

Copy link
Member

@Weijun-H Weijun-H left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks @erenavsarogullari

Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you very much @erenavsarogullari and @Weijun-H for the review

@@ -893,6 +895,100 @@ pub fn array_length(args: &[ArrayRef]) -> Result<ArrayRef> {
}
}

/// array_resize SQL function
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think @jayzhan211 may have a plan to split these functions up into different modules (e.g. not one giant kernels.rs file). No changes needed for this PR, just FYI

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @alamb. Yes, our direction will be like that with the next PR.

@@ -2082,6 +2084,36 @@ array_sort(array, desc, nulls_first)

- list_sort

### `array_resize`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Its cool to see improvements to the documentation as part of the porting over 👍

@erenavsarogullari
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @alamb and @Weijun-H for the reviews. Merge conflict is also addressed.

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Mar 14, 2024

Since I was taking a pass through anyways, I merged this PR up to main and fixed a compilation error.

@alamb alamb merged commit 9d0c05b into apache:main Mar 14, 2024
24 checks passed
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Mar 14, 2024

Thanks again @erenavsarogullari and @jayzhan211

@erenavsarogullari
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @alamb for follow-up and merge.

@erenavsarogullari erenavsarogullari deleted the Issue-9569 branch March 14, 2024 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
logical-expr Logical plan and expressions physical-expr Physical Expressions
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Port ArrayResize to functions-array subcrate
3 participants