Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor: Remove now dead SUPPORTED_STRUCT_TYPES #8480

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

alamb
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb commented Dec 9, 2023

Draft until #8463 is merged

Which issue does this PR close?

Follow on to #8463

Rationale for this change

#8463 removed the last use of SUPPORTED_STRUCT_TYPES so it is no longer needed in the code

What changes are included in this PR?

remove unused code

Are these changes tested?

Covered by existing tests

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

@github-actions github-actions bot added logical-expr Logical plan and expressions physical-expr Physical Expressions sqllogictest SQL Logic Tests (.slt) labels Dec 9, 2023
@alamb alamb marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2023 12:18
@korowa
Copy link
Contributor

korowa commented Dec 14, 2023

LGTM in DataFusion context, thank you @alamb

Just a question -- it doesn't look like a big deal for this one, but is it fine to remove public constant provided by crate without deprecating it first?

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Dec 14, 2023

LGTM in DataFusion context, thank you @alamb

Just a question -- it doesn't look like a big deal for this one, but is it fine to remove public constant provided by crate without deprecating it first?

That is a good question @korowa -- I think it is a judgement call based on if we think removing the pub thing is likely to be encountered during upgrade and if the API change will be hard to adjust to for users.

In this case I don't think it will have a big impact, though I fully admit I have no data one way or the other

Copy link
Contributor

@metesynnada metesynnada left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can merge this, since it is quite minor and will not introduce a big change.

@metesynnada metesynnada merged commit f54eeea into apache:main Dec 15, 2023
22 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
logical-expr Logical plan and expressions physical-expr Physical Expressions sqllogictest SQL Logic Tests (.slt)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants