Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change ScalarValue::Struct to ArrayRef #7893
Change ScalarValue::Struct to ArrayRef #7893
Changes from 7 commits
a6ebe74
2c2503c
177e72b
9efa792
b18eb25
608bdd7
4088750
8e8233f
fcce7f6
7e7e8bb
6b6f6e2
1a8a29c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mustafasrepo Have you considered changing
values: Vec<ScalarValue>
andordering_values: Vec<Vec<ScalarValue>>,
from vec to vecdeque for OrderSensitiveArrayAggAccumulator too? If we can have VecDequeue here, we can avoidinto()
and reuse evalute_orderings() for both Ordersensitive And NthValue. They do the similar things instead one is Vec, another is VecDeque.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we can file a follow on ticket to track this idea
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there might be a better design for StructArray (previous design is based on old ScalarValue::Struct). I avoid changing the logic or data structure in this PR.
May benefit #8558?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @mustafasrepo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it will benefit #8558 (won't harm either). However it will be a better change anyway.