-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add order by
construct in window function and logical plans
#463
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -174,6 +174,12 @@ message WindowExprNode { | |
// udaf = 3 | ||
} | ||
LogicalExprNode expr = 4; | ||
// repeated LogicalExprNode partition_by = 5; | ||
repeated LogicalExprNode order_by = 6; | ||
// repeated LogicalExprNode filter = 7; | ||
// oneof window_frame { | ||
// WindowFrame frame = 8; | ||
// } | ||
} | ||
|
||
message BetweenNode { | ||
|
@@ -317,14 +323,6 @@ message AggregateNode { | |
message WindowNode { | ||
LogicalPlanNode input = 1; | ||
repeated LogicalExprNode window_expr = 2; | ||
repeated LogicalExprNode partition_by_expr = 3; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. turns out these are no longer useful |
||
repeated LogicalExprNode order_by_expr = 4; | ||
// "optional" keyword is stable in protoc 3.15 but prost is still on 3.14 (see https://github.com/danburkert/prost/issues/430) | ||
// this syntax is ugly but is binary compatible with the "optional" keyword (see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42622015/how-to-define-an-optional-field-in-protobuf-3) | ||
oneof window_frame { | ||
WindowFrame frame = 5; | ||
} | ||
// TODO add filter by expr | ||
} | ||
|
||
enum WindowFrameUnits { | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can probably just delete the old fields in the protobuf files -- I suspect no one is using them in a way that requires backwards compatibility
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these commented out ones are not old, they are reminders of future fields.