Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename aggregation modules, GroupColumn #12619

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

alamb
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb commented Sep 25, 2024

Which issue does this PR close?

Follow on to #12269 from @jayzhan211

Rationale for this change

As I was reviewing the code, the names of the modules don't quite match their contents and aren't consistent with row.rs, so I would like to fix that as we begin to work on this code more

Changes:

What changes are included in this PR?

  1. rename modules to match contents and reflect structure.
  2. rename ArrowRowEq to GroupColumn as I think that better reflects what the trait does

Are these changes tested?

CI tests

Are there any user-facing changes?

@alamb alamb marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2024 13:10
@github-actions github-actions bot added the physical-expr Physical Expressions label Sep 25, 2024
@comphead comphead added the api change Changes the API exposed to users of the crate label Sep 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@jayzhan211 jayzhan211 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@jayzhan211
Copy link
Contributor

Since the change is not released, I think there is no API change

@jayzhan211 jayzhan211 merged commit 26c8004 into apache:main Sep 25, 2024
24 checks passed
@alamb alamb deleted the alamb/rationalize_module_names branch September 26, 2024 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api change Changes the API exposed to users of the crate physical-expr Physical Expressions
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants