-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add more sqllogictests for parquet_sorted_statistics
#10381
Conversation
I think it's better to push this though not finished to get early comments to better modify the code. 😀 |
I agree -- thank you @yyy1000 -- I changed the description to reflect this |
parquet_sorted_statsitics
parquet_sorted_statsitics
parquet_sorted_statistics
WITH ORDER (a ASC NULLS LAST) | ||
LOCATION 'test_files/scratch/parquet_sorted_statistics/test_table1'; | ||
|
||
query TT |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks @yyy1000 would you mind adding the description what exactly it tests, what is so outstanding in the output we looking for?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, the test is mainly from #9593 (comment), I think it will test the case when schema and query order to verify sort preserving merge would not be used.
Will add the description soon.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like it, but I'd say the test looks slightly confusing me as its not very clear what exactly the test is asserting, would be nice to have the test description
Which issue does this PR close?
Part of #10336 .
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?