enum name changed for logger update reverted

[DaanHoogland]

Description

This PR fixes an unintended name change on an enum member for pooltype

Fixes: #9915

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI
• test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 4.04%. Comparing base (f7b7339) to head (044553a).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (f7b7339) and HEAD (044553a). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (f7b7339)	HEAD (044553a)
unittests	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #9922       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     15.80%   4.04%   -11.77%     
============================================
  Files          5627     392     -5235     
  Lines        492294   32170   -460124     
  Branches      62198    5677    -56521     
============================================
- Hits          77824    1301    -76523     
+ Misses       405946   30721   -375225     
+ Partials       8524     148     -8376     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.04% <ø> (ø)
unittests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[slavkap]

code LGTM

[JoaoJandre]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@JoaoJandre a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11558

[JoaoJandre]

@DaanHoogland @sureshanaparti could we run the CI here?

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan test

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11776)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 55091 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9922-t11776-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 140 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
test_01_secure_vm_migration	Error	398.00	test_vm_life_cycle.py

[weizhouapache]

Lgtm