Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(api): store executed traits in status #5851

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 21, 2024

Conversation

squakez
Copy link
Contributor

@squakez squakez commented Sep 18, 2024

Release Note

feat(api): store executed traits in status

Copy link
Contributor

✔️ Unit test coverage report - coverage increased from 44.4% to 44.8% (+0.4%)

@squakez squakez force-pushed the feat/store_status_traits branch from 499091a to 86854bc Compare September 18, 2024 14:10
Copy link
Contributor

✔️ Unit test coverage report - coverage increased from 44.4% to 44.9% (+0.5%)

@squakez squakez force-pushed the feat/store_status_traits branch from 86854bc to 4154069 Compare September 19, 2024 16:46
Copy link
Contributor

✔️ Unit test coverage report - coverage increased from 44.4% to 44.9% (+0.5%)

@squakez squakez marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2024 17:10
@squakez squakez force-pushed the feat/store_status_traits branch from 4154069 to 4ccdf46 Compare September 21, 2024 13:10
Copy link
Contributor

✔️ Unit test coverage report - coverage increased from 44.4% to 45% (+0.6%)

@squakez squakez force-pushed the feat/store_status_traits branch from 4ccdf46 to 3a52c35 Compare September 21, 2024 14:24
@squakez squakez merged commit 050b17c into apache:main Sep 21, 2024
8 of 10 checks passed
@squakez
Copy link
Contributor Author

squakez commented Sep 21, 2024

Checks errors due to #5855

@squakez squakez deleted the feat/store_status_traits branch September 21, 2024 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants