Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make sure global and local operators can cohexist #751

Closed
nicolaferraro opened this issue Jun 17, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Make sure global and local operators can cohexist #751

nicolaferraro opened this issue Jun 17, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@nicolaferraro
Copy link
Member

Don't know if this is needed or can be manager completely within OLM, but if installed manually, two operators (a global and a local one) in a cluster can have issues.

We can add a check that is activated only in global mode, to dynamically blacklist some namespaces if there's already an local operator.

@nicolaferraro
Copy link
Member Author

@nicolaferraro nicolaferraro modified the milestones: 1.0.0-RC2, 1.0.0-future Feb 20, 2020
@nicolaferraro nicolaferraro modified the milestones: 1.0.0, post 1.0.0 Apr 28, 2020
@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor

looks like there won't be any solution form the operator-sdk

@nicolaferraro
Copy link
Member Author

Solution reported from them is to use OLM to avoid overlapping configurations. So we do.

@nicolaferraro
Copy link
Member Author

Maybe we can do better, adding a guard ourselves can help. Currently I need an empty cluster if I want to check that global mode works, but this can be avoided with some simple checks in the global operator.

@nicolaferraro nicolaferraro reopened this Nov 2, 2020
nicolaferraro added a commit to nicolaferraro/camel-k that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2020
nicolaferraro added a commit to nicolaferraro/camel-k that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2020
nicolaferraro added a commit to nicolaferraro/camel-k that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2020
nicolaferraro added a commit to nicolaferraro/camel-k that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants